The DNA damage response at dysfunctional telomeres, and at interstitial and subtelomeric DNA double-strand breaks

被引:10
|
作者
Muraki, Keiko [1 ,2 ]
Murnane, John P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Inst Prot Res, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2340 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
C-NHEJ; A-NHEJ; processing; rearrangements; subtelomere; MAINTAINS GENOMIC STABILITY; CLASS SWITCH RECOMBINATION; REPAIR PATHWAY CHOICE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MAMMALIAN TELOMERES; TUMOR SUPPRESSION; END RESECTION; HUMAN-CELLS; CHROMOSOME INSTABILITY; KAP-1; PHOSPHORYLATION;
D O I
10.1266/ggs.17-00014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In mammals, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are primarily repaired by classical non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ), although homologous recombination repair and alternative NHEJ (A-NHEJ), which involve DSB processing, can also occur. These pathways are tightly regulated to maintain chromosome integrity. The ends of chromosomes, called telomeres, contain telomeric DNA that forms a cap structure in cooperation with telomeric proteins to prevent the activation of the DNA damage response and chromosome fusion at chromosome termini. Telomeres and subtelomeric regions are poor substrates for DNA replication; therefore, regions near telomeres are prone to replication fork stalling and chromosome breakage. Moreover, DSBs near telomeres are poorly repaired. As a result, when DSBs occur near telomeres in normal cells, the cells stop proliferating, while in cancer cells, subtelomeric DSBs induce rearrangements due to the absence of cell cycle checkpoints. The sensitivity of subtelomeric regions to DSBs is due to the improper regulation of processing, because although C-NHEJ is functional at subtelomeric DSBs, excessive processing results in an increased frequency of large deletions and chromosome rearrangements involving A-NHEJ.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 152
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REPAIR OF DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS
    HUTCHINSON, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPRAMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 1978, : 18 - 18
  • [22] Fragmentation in DNA double-strand breaks
    Wei, ZY
    Zang, LH
    Li, M
    Fan, W
    Xu, YJ
    [J]. ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2005, 54 (10) : 4955 - 4960
  • [23] DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS IN MUTAGENESIS
    PHILLIPS, JW
    MORGAN, WF
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 1993, 22 (04) : 214 - 217
  • [24] Differences in the recruitment of DNA repair proteins at subtelomeric and interstitial I-Scel endonuclease-induced DNA double-strand breaks
    Silva, Barbara Alcaraz
    Jones, Trevor J.
    Murnane, John P.
    [J]. DNA REPAIR, 2017, 49 : 1 - 8
  • [25] Real Estate in the DNA Damage Response: Ubiquitin and SUMO Ligases Home in on DNA Double-Strand Breaks
    Dantuma, Nico P.
    Pfeiffer, Annika
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2016, 7
  • [26] An Emerging Regulatory Role for the Tumor Microenvironment in the DNA Damage Response to Double-Strand Breaks
    Lama-Sherpa, Tshering D.
    Shevde, Lalita A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [27] Dynamic behavior of DNA topoisomerase IIβ in response to DNA double-strand breaks
    Morotomi-Yano, Keiko
    Saito, Shinta
    Adachi, Noritaka
    Yano, Ken-ichi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [28] Role of DNA-PK in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks
    Burma, S
    Chen, DJ
    [J]. DNA REPAIR, 2004, 3 (8-9) : 909 - 918
  • [29] Dynamic behavior of DNA topoisomerase IIβ in response to DNA double-strand breaks
    Keiko Morotomi-Yano
    Shinta Saito
    Noritaka Adachi
    Ken-ichi Yano
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [30] Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response
    S. G. Chankova
    E. Dimova
    M. Dimitrova
    P. E. Bryant
    [J]. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2007, 46 : 409 - 416