Sustainability evaluation of pipe asset management strategies

被引:6
|
作者
Matthews, John C. [1 ]
Piratla, Kalyan [2 ]
Koo, Dan D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Pure Technol, 7231 Palmetto Dr, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, 109 Lowry Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] IUPUI, 799 W Michigan St,ET 314J, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Sustainability Evaluation; Pipe Asset Management; Pipe Condition Assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.025
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The consequences associated with pipe failures can be widespread impacting service, while potentially causing damage, affecting traffic, and contaminating water. Recently the visibility of pipe failures has increased with social media and 24-hour news coverage. In response, many utilities have adapted pipe asset management strategies to reduce failures. Also, many technologies have emerged that allow for a more proactive pipe asset management. As sustainability has become a focus for many organizations including utilities, the question becomes which pipe asset management strategy is most sustainable. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate three pipe asset management strategies for sustainability using Envision (R). The strategies include: a reactive run-to-failure and then replace; a preemptive replacement prior to failure based on assumed condition; and a balanced approach of active condition assessment and action based on the known condition. Envision (R) will be used to evaluate each approach to determine its sustainability rating. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal asset management strategies for mixed transit fleet
    Ngo, Huan Hoang
    Shah, Rohan
    Mishra, Sabyasachee
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 117 : 103 - 116
  • [32] An overview of energy pipeline integrity management, and future asset management strategies
    Hussain, Muhammad
    Zhang, Tieling
    Ali, Shahid
    Hussain, Abrar
    Corrosion Management, 2020, 2020-February (153): : 22 - 24
  • [33] BIM, GIS AND BI TOOLS FOR A UNIVERSITY ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUPPORTING SPACE MANAGEMENT, OCCUPANCY EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES
    Di Giuda, Giuseppe Martino
    Meschini, Silvia
    Gasbarri, Paola
    Accardo, Daniele
    Tagliabue, Lavinia Chiara
    Cacciaguerra, Elisa
    Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 2024, 29 : 1128 - 1155
  • [34] Evaluation of proposed integrated diseases management strategies in blackberry cultivation according to its sustainability
    Zapata Narvaez, Yimmy Alexander
    Beltran-Acosta, Camilo Ruben
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA, 2019, 41 (05)
  • [35] Towards availability and sustainability in customer value assessment of asset management services
    Ojanen, Ville
    Ahonen, Toni
    Reunanen, Markku
    Hanski, Jyri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 6 (04) : 368 - 391
  • [36] Performance Evaluation of Water Asset Management in China
    Zhu, Haibo
    Wang, Zhen
    Liu, Tianxiao
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-8, 2011, 71-78 : 2116 - 2121
  • [37] Performance evaluation framework for IT/IS based asset management
    Haider, Abrar
    Koronios, Andy
    ICEIS 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SPECIFICATION, 2006, : 355 - +
  • [38] Asset management evaluation: A pilot case study
    Bauby, C. E.
    Charbonnier, B.
    Haik, P.
    Lacombe, S.
    Lonchampt, J.
    Remy, E.
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2007, 129 (01): : 148 - 154
  • [39] Personal asset management tools: Review and evaluation
    Mai, Huey
    Haddad, Hisham M.
    WMSCI 2006: 10TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 374 - 379
  • [40] Asset management evaluation: A pilot case study
    Bauby, C. E.
    Charbonnier, B.
    Haik, P.
    Lacombe, S.
    Lonchampt, J.
    Remy, E.
    Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference 2005, Vol 7, 2005, 7 : 41 - 47