The psychological appeal of owning private land for conservation

被引:21
|
作者
Gooden, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Grenyer, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Smith Sch Enterprise & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
关键词
autonomy; conservation psychology; eudaimonia; extrinsic motivation; grounded theory; intrinsic motivation; personal projects; philanthropy; well-being; MOTIVATIONS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13215
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Continued threats to global biodiversity have stimulated interest in the private purchase of land for conservation. Though not a new phenomenon, private land conservation appears to be on the rise, and its ambiguous position between philanthropy and financial investment leads to questions about the nature of landowner motives. To examine these motives, we used grounded theory techniques to analyze transcripts of narrative interviews with the owners of privately conserved areas (PCAs) and assessed what landowners had in common across a variety of cultural and policy contexts. The result was a model of PCA engagement in which landowners became personally invested in the management of PCAs and in the nature they protected. We found that PCAs can be conceptualized not merely as philanthropic endeavors or investments, but also as meaningful projects in which their owners engage. We integrated our findings with literature indicating that fundamental psychological drives for autonomy, efficacy, and social connection facilitate the engagement process, regardless of whether conservation motivation is intrinsic or extrinsic. Our findings suggest that land conservation programs might benefit from allowing landowner autonomy to the maximum extent possible, developing best practice standards against which landowners can assess their efficacy, and facilitating the development of landowner networks.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in private land conservation: Increasing complexity, shifting conservation purposes and allowable private land uses
    Owley, Jessica
    Rissman, Adena R.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 51 : 76 - 84
  • [2] Private Land Conservation and Public Policy: Land Trusts, Land Owners, and Conservation Easements
    Parker, Dominic P.
    Thurman, Walter N.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 11, 2019, 11 : 337 - 354
  • [3] Endangered species conservation on private land
    Polasky, S
    Doremus, H
    Rettig, B
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 1997, 15 (04) : 66 - 76
  • [4] The practice and promise of private land conservation
    Drescher, Michael
    Brenner, Jacob C.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):
  • [5] PRIVATE LAND MANAGEMENT FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
    OCONNELL, MA
    NOSS, RF
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 16 (04) : 435 - 450
  • [6] Ideas, incentives, gifts, and governance: Toward conservation stewardship of private land, in cultural and psychological perspective
    Elmendorf, CS
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2003, (02): : 423 - 505
  • [7] Trends and values of "Land for Wildlife' programs for private land conservation
    Prado, Joshua A.
    Puszka, Helena
    Forman, Alexander
    Cooke, Benjamin
    Fitzsimons, James A.
    ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2018, 19 (02) : 136 - 146
  • [8] Devil's gate: Owning the land, owning the story
    Bowers, Carol
    NEW MEXICO HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2008, 83 (02) : 251 - 252
  • [9] Meaning, Belonging and Well-being: The Socio-psychological Benefits of Engaging in Private Land Conservation
    Yasue, Mai
    Kirkpatrick, James B.
    Davison, Aidan
    CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2020, 18 (03): : 268 - 279
  • [10] Delivery of habitat conservation programs on private land
    Riley, Terry Z.
    Marymor, Noe
    Riley, Nancy D.
    White, Bill
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2019, 43 (03): : 408 - 413