Delivery of habitat conservation programs on private land

被引:1
|
作者
Riley, Terry Z. [1 ]
Marymor, Noe [2 ]
Riley, Nancy D. [3 ]
White, Bill [4 ]
机构
[1] North Amer Grouse Partnership, 460 Pinon Ridge Rd, Laporte, CO 80535 USA
[2] Nat Resources Conservat Serv, 4302 W 9th St, Greeley, CO 80634 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, 460 Pinon Ridge Rd, Laporte, CO 80535 USA
[4] Missouri Dept Conservat, 2901 W Truman Blvd, Jefferson City, MO 65109 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2019年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
conservation delivery; duplication; habitat; inefficiency; species in greatest conservation need;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.999
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
State Wildlife Action Plans serve as blueprints for conserving our nation's fish and wildlife and preventing endangered species listings. These plans guide conservation of >12,000 species in greatest conservation need. Recovering these species will require a dramatic increase in funding. The majority of these habitat-restoration efforts will have to be located on private land, particularly in the eastern two-thirds of the United States. A wide variety of state and federal habitat conservation programs and associated funding sources already exist, but current funding mechanisms appear to be inadequate to meet conservation needs, and delivery mechanisms are duplicative. Coordination is difficult for state and federal natural resource agencies, which can lead to inefficiency and redundancy among programs. Successful conservation depends on the collaboration of many individuals, government agencies, and nongovernmental organizations. Conservation program efficiency can be improved by expanding, strengthening, and simplifying partnerships. We believe federal natural-resource agencies should transfer funds to states through block grants and technical-service provider agreements to manage and protect habitats for threatened and endangered species, migratory birds, and other federal-trust species primarily through conservation delivery on private lands. (c) 2019 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 413
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Private-land habitat opportunities for prairie grouse through federal conservation programs
    Riley, TZ
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2004, 32 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [2] Trends and values of "Land for Wildlife' programs for private land conservation
    Prado, Joshua A.
    Puszka, Helena
    Forman, Alexander
    Cooke, Benjamin
    Fitzsimons, James A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2018, 19 (02) : 136 - 146
  • [3] Landowner and Practitioner Perspectives on Private Land Conservation Programs
    Lute, Michelle L.
    Gillespie, Caitlyn R.
    Martin, Dustin R.
    Fontaine, Joseph J.
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 31 (02) : 218 - 231
  • [4] Endangered species conservation on private land: Assessing the effectiveness of habitat conservation plans
    Langpap, Christian
    Kerkvliet, Joe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 64 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [5] Species at risk habitat conservation on private land: the perspective of cattle ranchers
    Dana Reiter
    Lael Parrott
    Jeremy Pittman
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2021, 30 : 2377 - 2393
  • [6] Species at risk habitat conservation on private land: the perspective of cattle ranchers
    Reiter, Dana
    Parrott, Lael
    Pittman, Jeremy
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30 (8-9) : 2377 - 2393
  • [7] Private Landowners, Voluntary Conservation Programs, and Implementation of Conservation Friendly Land Management Practices
    Farmer, James R.
    Ma, Zhao
    Drescher, Michael
    Knackmuhs, Eric G.
    Dickinson, Stephanie L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (01): : 58 - 66
  • [8] Understanding the Motivations, Satisfaction, and Retention of Landowners in Private Land Conservation Programs
    不详
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2018, 11 (03):
  • [9] Understanding the Motivations, Satisfaction, and Retention of Landowners in Private Land Conservation Programs
    Selinske, Matthew J.
    Coetzee, Jan
    Purnell, Kerry
    Knight, Andrew T.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2015, 8 (04): : 282 - 289
  • [10] Economic incentives for habitat conservation on private land: Applications to the Inland Pacific Northwest
    Williams, CE
    Lathbury, ME
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1996, 24 (02) : 187 - 191