Using short-term tests to predict carcinogenic activity in the long-term bioassay

被引:0
|
作者
Kodell, RL
Chen, JJ
Jackson, CD
Gaylor, DW
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biometry & Risk Assessment, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] US FDA, Off Risk Assessment Policy & Res, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
来源
关键词
Ames test; logistic regression; classification; positive predictivity; negative predictivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A method for classifying chemicals with respect to carcinogenic potential based on short-term test results is presented. The method utilizes the logistic regression model to translate results from short-term toxicity assays into predictions of the likelihood that a chemical will be carcinogenic if tested in a long-term bioassay. The proposed method differs from previous approaches in two ways. First, statistical confidence limits on probabilities of cancer rather than central estimates of those probabilities are used for classification. Second, the method does not classify all chemicals in a data base with respect to carcinogenic potential. Instead, it identifies chemicals with highest and lowest likelihood of testing positive for carcinogenicity in the bioassay. A subset of chemicals with intermediate likelihood of being positive remains unclassified, and will require further testing, perhaps in a long-term bioassay. Two data bases of binary short-term and long-term test results from the literature are used to illustrate and evaluate the proposed procedure. A cross-validation analysis of one of the data sets suggests that, for a sufficiently rich data base of chemicals, the development of a robust predictive system to replace the bioassay for some unknown chemicals is a realistic goal.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 443
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SHORT-TERM LOAN, LONG-TERM
    Verma, Henrietta
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2014, 139 (18) : 18 - +
  • [22] SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM QUESTIONS
    SVEIKAUSKAS, L
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1976, 99 (05) : 59 - 60
  • [23] LONG-TERM VS SHORT-TERM
    PORTER, JR
    [J]. FORTUNE, 1986, 114 (05) : 20 - 20
  • [24] Short-term alcohol and drug treatment outcomes predict long-term outcome
    Weisner, C
    Ray, GT
    Mertens, JR
    Satre, DD
    Moore, C
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 71 (03) : 281 - 294
  • [25] Does short-term effectiveness predict long-term adherence with statin therapy?
    Benner, JS
    Pollack, MF
    Smith, TW
    Bullano, MF
    Willey, VJ
    Williams, SA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (20) : E293 - E294
  • [26] USING SHORT-TERM MRI MEASURES TO PREDICT LONG-TERM OUTCOMES IN THE COMBIRX RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Wolinsky, Jerry S.
    Narayana, Ponnada A.
    Nelson, Flavia
    Datta, Sushmita
    Gates, Brandi
    Salter, Amber R.
    Conwit, Robin
    Cutter, Gary R.
    Cofield, Stacey S.
    Lublin, Fred D.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (09) : S8 - S8
  • [27] USING FINDINGS FROM SHORT-TERM TESTS TO ESTIMATE LONG-TERM CREEP DATA FOR POLYMERIC MATERIALS
    MLYNEK, D
    THIEME, R
    LEWIN, G
    [J]. CHEMISCHE TECHNIK, 1987, 39 (05): : 226 - 226
  • [28] Short-term Costs for Long-term Benefits
    Spadafora, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION, 2012, 52 (01) : 108 - 123
  • [29] REPLICATION OF LONG-TERM WITH SHORT-TERM OPTIONS
    CHOIE, KS
    NOVOMESTKY, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1989, 15 (02): : 17 - 19
  • [30] Long-term testing in a short-term world
    Rokosz, VT
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2003, 20 (03) : 64 - +