Review of Cochrane Reviews on Acupuncture: How Chinese Resources Contribute to Cochrane Reviews

被引:4
|
作者
Jiao, Shuang [1 ]
Tsutani, Kiichiro [2 ]
Haga, Nobuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Drug Policy & Management, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
TRIALS;
D O I
10.1089/acm.2012.0113
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Cochrane Systematic Reviews (CSRs) are frequently referenced by acupuncture efficacy studies currently. In this study, the CSRs on acupuncture are reviewed, and the disease fields they covered and the conclusions they reached are analyzed. In order to explore the potential contribution to CSRs by Chinese resources, the authors analyzed whether the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, and the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials would affect the positive conclusion ratios of the CSRs. Methods: Acupuncture-related CSRs in the Cochrane Library were searched and classified based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10). The CSRs were further designated as positive or negative according to the conclusion statements. CSRs with the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials were extracted, and the positive ratios of conclusions were compared separately with corresponding CSRs without those three Chinese resources. Results: Thirty-two (32) CSRs were identified, 9 (28.1%) of which reached positive conclusions. The CSRs with positive conclusions were mainly about multifarious pains, nausea and vomiting, and functional disorders. Seventeen (17; 53.1%) included the participation of Chinese reviewers, 18 (56.3%) involved the utilization of Chinese databases, and 20 (62.5%) included Chinese clinical trials. No differences on the positive conclusion ratios were observed between CSRs with reviewers from Chinese institutions and those that did not (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 1.62), the utilization of Chinese databases and those that did not (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11, 2.44), or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials and those that did not (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.26, 6.49). Conclusions: Most CSRs on acupuncture are inconclusive. No significant differences regarding the positive conclusion ratios were found between the CSRs with or without the utilization of Chinese resources.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 621
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF REPORTING FOR TREATMENT COMPONENTS IN COCHRANE REVIEWS OF ACUPUNCTURE
    Kun Hyung Kim
    Jung Won Kang
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Jae Dong Lee
    [J]. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2014, (03) : 300 - 300
  • [22] Overview of Cochrane reviews on Chinese herbal medicine for stroke
    Wei, Maoling
    Wang, Deren
    Kang, Deying
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Ang, Lin
    Song, Eunhye
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) : 5 - 9
  • [23] Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews
    Nasser, Mona
    Welch, Vivian
    Tugwell, Peter
    Ueffing, Erin
    Doyle, Jodie
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (05) : 474 - 482
  • [24] Quality of Cochrane reviews - Another study found that most Cochrane reviews are of a good standard
    Handoll, H
    Madhok, R
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7336): : 546 - 546
  • [25] Cochrane Reviews are not perfect - but generally better than non-Cochrane systematic reviews
    Bollig, Claudia
    Rueschemeyer, Georg
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    [J]. SUCHT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WISSENSCHAFT UND PRAXIS, 2020, 66 (03): : 170 - 172
  • [26] Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview
    Hu, Jing
    Zhang, Junhua
    Zhao, Wei
    Zhang, Yongling
    Zhang, Li
    Shang, Hongcai
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [27] How Is Health Equity Assessed in Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews?
    Janusz, Nicole
    Dewidar, Omar
    Dowling, Sierra
    Wang, Harry
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Conde, Monserrat
    Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong
    Maxwell, Lara
    Tugwell, Peter
    Howe, Tracey
    Welch, Vivian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 49 (12) : 1379 - 1384
  • [28] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Solari, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01)
  • [29] Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration
    Kale, R
    Silagy, C
    [J]. NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 1996, 9 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [30] Cochrane reviews of surgical treatments
    Fairley, Jim
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 31 (06): : 496 - 498