Review of Cochrane Reviews on Acupuncture: How Chinese Resources Contribute to Cochrane Reviews

被引:4
|
作者
Jiao, Shuang [1 ]
Tsutani, Kiichiro [2 ]
Haga, Nobuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Drug Policy & Management, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
TRIALS;
D O I
10.1089/acm.2012.0113
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Cochrane Systematic Reviews (CSRs) are frequently referenced by acupuncture efficacy studies currently. In this study, the CSRs on acupuncture are reviewed, and the disease fields they covered and the conclusions they reached are analyzed. In order to explore the potential contribution to CSRs by Chinese resources, the authors analyzed whether the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, and the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials would affect the positive conclusion ratios of the CSRs. Methods: Acupuncture-related CSRs in the Cochrane Library were searched and classified based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10). The CSRs were further designated as positive or negative according to the conclusion statements. CSRs with the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials were extracted, and the positive ratios of conclusions were compared separately with corresponding CSRs without those three Chinese resources. Results: Thirty-two (32) CSRs were identified, 9 (28.1%) of which reached positive conclusions. The CSRs with positive conclusions were mainly about multifarious pains, nausea and vomiting, and functional disorders. Seventeen (17; 53.1%) included the participation of Chinese reviewers, 18 (56.3%) involved the utilization of Chinese databases, and 20 (62.5%) included Chinese clinical trials. No differences on the positive conclusion ratios were observed between CSRs with reviewers from Chinese institutions and those that did not (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 1.62), the utilization of Chinese databases and those that did not (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11, 2.44), or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials and those that did not (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.26, 6.49). Conclusions: Most CSRs on acupuncture are inconclusive. No significant differences regarding the positive conclusion ratios were found between the CSRs with or without the utilization of Chinese resources.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 621
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acupuncture for Pain:An Overview of Cochrane Reviews
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Edzard Ernst
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2011, 17 (03) : 187 - 189
  • [2] Acupuncture for pain: An overview of Cochrane reviews
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Ernst, Edzard
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 17 (03) : 187 - 189
  • [3] Acupuncture for pain: an overview of Cochrane reviews
    M. S. Lee
    E. Ernst
    Michael Hammes
    [J]. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur, 2012, 55 (1) : 21 - 22
  • [4] Acupuncture for pain: an overview of Cochrane reviews
    Lee, M. S.
    Ernst, E.
    Hammes, Michael
    [J]. DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR AKUPUNKTUR, 2012, 55 (01): : 21 - 22
  • [5] Acupuncture for Pain:An Overview of Cochrane Reviews
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Edzard Ernst
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine . , 2011, (03) - 189
  • [6] Acupuncture for pain: An overview of Cochrane reviews
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Edzard Ernst
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2011, 17 : 187 - 189
  • [7] Acupuncture for neurological disorders in the Cochrane reviews
    Wang, Deren
    Yang, Weimin
    Liu, Ming
    [J]. NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (06) : 440 - 443
  • [8] Overview of the acupuncture parts in the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration *
    Zhang Kuo
    Chen Bo
    Li Zhong-zheng
    Ding Sha-sha
    Lu Zhong-xi
    Yu Hai-long
    Hong Shou-hai
    Liu Dan
    Zhao Xue
    Guo Yi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE-MOXIBUSTION, 2016, 26 (04) : 50 - 60
  • [9] Quality of Cochrane reviews - Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews
    Petticrew, M
    Wilson, P
    Wright, K
    Song, FJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7336): : 545 - 545
  • [10] The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
    Zhaochen Ji
    Junhua Zhang
    Francesca Menniti-Ippolito
    Marco Massari
    Alice Josephine Fauci
    Na Li
    Fengwen Yang
    Mingyan Zhang
    [J]. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 20