Factors Influencing Early Disc Height Loss Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:16
|
作者
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Soh, Tamara Lee Ting [1 ]
Tan, Mark [1 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Low back pain; Retroperitoneal space; Spinal fusion; Spine; Spondylosis; REVISION SURGERY; OUTCOMES; DECOMPRESSION; SUBSIDENCE;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2019.0332
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective radiological analysis. Purpose: To analyze the factors influencing early disc height loss following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Overview of Literature: Postoperative disc height loss can occur naturally as a result of mechanical loading. This phenomenon is enabled by the yielding of the polyaxial screw heads and settling of the cage to the endplates. When coupled with cage subsidence, there can be significant reduction in the foraminal space which ultimately compromises the indirect decompression achieved by LLIF. Methods: Seventy-two cage levels in 37 patients aged 62 +/- 10.2 years who underwent single or multilevel LLIF for degenerative spinal conditions were selected. Their preoperative and postoperative follow-up radiographs were used to measure the anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), mean disc height (MDH), disc space angle (DSA), and segmental angle. Correlations between the loss of disc height and several factors, including age, construct length, preoperative lordosis, postoperative lordosis, disc height, cage dimensions, and cage position, were analyzed. Results: We found that the lateral interbody cages significantly increased ADH, PDH, MDH, and DSA after surgery (p<0.0001). However, there was a loss of disc height over time. All postoperative disc height parameters, especially the amount of increase in MDH (r=0.413, p<0.0001) after surgery, showed a significant positive association with early disc height loss. The levels demonstrating a significant (>= 25%) height loss were those that exhibited a substantial height increase (128.3%, 4.6 +/- 3.0 to 10.5 +/- 5.6 mm) postoperatively. However, the levels that showed less than 25% height loss were those that exhibited, on average, only a 57.4% height increase post-operatively. Conclusions: The greater the postoperative increase in disc height, the greater the disc height loss throughout early follow-up. Therefore, achieving an optimal disc height rather than overcorrection is an important surgical strategy to adopt when performing LLIF.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 607
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [32] Lumbar disc arthroplasty compared with interbody fusion
    McCormick, Paul C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 8 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [33] Preoperative dorsal disc height is a predictor of indirect decompression effect through oblique lateral interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative stenosis
    Iwasaki, Motoyuki
    Hayase, Hitoshi
    Takamiya, Soichiro
    Yamazaki, Kazuyoshi
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (41) : E31020
  • [34] Risk Factors for Readmissions Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Phan, Kevin
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Kothari, Parth
    Kim, Jun S.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (05) : 364 - 369
  • [35] Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zavras, Athan G.
    Federico, Vincent
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Butler, Alexander J.
    Dandu, Navya
    Munim, Mohammed
    Harper, Daniel E.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    DeWald, Christopher J.
    An, Howard S.
    Singh, Kern
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 257 - 264
  • [36] Analysis of the Factors Affecting Lumbar Segmental Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Takemoto, Mitsuru
    Kimura, Hiroaki
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Murata, Koichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (14) : E839 - E846
  • [37] Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Satake, Kotaro
    Ito, Kenyu
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Ouchida, Jun
    Segi, Naoki
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Ando, Kei
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    Imagama, Shiro
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (18) : E1172 - E1178
  • [38] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [39] Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine
    Wang, YiXiao
    Song, Yang
    Ma, Yue
    Sun, Xinyu
    Wang, Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (10) : 2238 - 2242
  • [40] Indication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation
    Satoh, I
    Yonenobu, K
    Hosono, N
    Ohwada, T
    Fuji, T
    Yoshikawa, H
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (02): : 104 - 108