Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants

被引:0
|
作者
Yoon, Hyungjoon [1 ]
Park, Jaedeuk [1 ]
Lim, Wonsub [1 ]
Lee, Kwanghee [1 ]
Choi, Nakki
Lee, Chuljae
Moon, Il [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
关键词
Integrated Risk Assessment; Quantitative and Qualitative Methods; Potential Hazards; Annum Risk Contour; CHEMICAL-PROCESS DESIGN; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1007/s11814-013-0057-0
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the development of an integrated risk assessment system to increase the safety of gas refinery plants. This integration is important in managing the design and the operation. of chemical plants and it requires significant time, effort and specialized expertise. We propose a systematic procedure to apply quantitative and qualitative hazard identification methods before constructing the refinery plants. Advantages of this assessment procedure are 1) systematic method in identifying most of the important hazards, 2) complete and rigorous analysis, and 3) reducing budget and time. The qualitative and quantitative assessment method consists of two and three steps, respectively. After these five steps, the risk of the same plant was calculated and analyzed. This method can identify risk and potential hazards from local gas refinery plants effectively and systematically. We applied the integrated qualitative and quantitative risk assessment method to remove the risk of a local gas refinery plant with 160 P&ID sheets. The result of this work confirmed that no residential population existed within the bounds of the 1 x 10(-6) per annum risk contour. Therefore, the risk to the public from the gas refinery plants should be considered acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1374
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recent innovations in analytical methods for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of lignin
    Lupoi, Jason S.
    Singh, Seema
    Parthasarathi, Ramakrishnan
    Simmons, Blake A.
    Henry, Robert J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 49 : 871 - 906
  • [32] EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL TRANSIT OF LIQUID
    HAM, HR
    GEORGES, B
    GUILLAUME, M
    ERBSMANN, F
    DOBBELEIR, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1985, 11 (01): : 17 - 21
  • [34] QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE METHODS
    PETRUSEK, M
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS, 1990, 26 (1-2): : 75 - 90
  • [35] Quantitative, Qualitative and Geospatial Methods to Characterize HIV Risk Environments
    Conners, Erin E.
    West, Brooke S.
    Roth, Alexis M.
    Meckel-Parker, Kristen G.
    Kwan, Mei-Po
    Magis-Rodriguez, Carlos
    Staines-Orozco, Hugo
    Clapp, John D.
    Brouwer, Kimberly C.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [36] Quantitative and Qualitative Methods to Support Therapeutic Risk Minimization Efforts
    Alfaro, Noelia
    Qizilbash, Nawab
    Rubino, Annalisa
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 290 - 291
  • [37] A critical analysis of the integration of life cycle methods and quantitative methods for sustainability assessment
    Cerchione, Roberto
    Morelli, Mariarosaria
    Passaro, Renato
    Quinto, Ivana
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (02) : 1508 - 1544
  • [38] Risk assessment of worldwide refinery accidents using advanced classification methods: Effects of refinery configuration and geographic location on outcome risk levels
    Burgherr, Peter
    Spada, Matteo
    Cinelli, Marco
    Blaszczynski, Jurek
    Slowinski, Roman
    Pannatier, Yvan
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1681 - 1688
  • [39] Application and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Intervention Studies in Rehabilitation Research
    Wirtz, M. A.
    Strohmer, J.
    REHABILITATION, 2016, 55 (03) : 191 - 199
  • [40] Criteria for Quantitative and Qualitative Data Integration Mixed-Methods Research Methodology
    Lee, Seonah
    Smith, Carrol A. M.
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2012, 30 (05) : 251 - 256