The Brazilian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician rating scale (NPI-C): reliability and validity in dementia

被引：20
|
作者：
Stella, Florindo [1 ,2 ]
Forlenza, Orestes Vicente [2 ]
Laks, Jerson [3 ]
de Andrade, Larissa Pires [1 ]
Ljubetic Avendano, Michelle A. [2 ]
Gasparetto Se, Elisandra Villela [4 ]
Cacao, Joao de Castilho [5 ]
Lyketsos, Constantine G. [6 ]
de Medeiros, Kate [7 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Biosci Inst, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept & Inst Psychiat, Lab Neurosci LIM 27, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Psychiat, Ctr Alzheimers Dis & Related Disorders, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Med, Clin Geriatr Psychiat, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[5] FAMERP Fac Med, Geriatr Unity, Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Brazil
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychiat, Johns Hopkins Bayview, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Miami Univ, Dept Sociol & Gerontol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
来源：
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS | 2013年 / 25卷 / 09期
基金：
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词：
neuropsychiatric symptoms; dementia; Alzheimer's disease; scale; neuropsychiatric assessment; Brazil; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; SYMPTOMS; DEPRESSION; APATHY; IMPAIRMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I：
10.1017/S1041610213000811
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
Background: Patients with dementia may be unable to describe their symptoms, and caregivers frequently suffer emotional burden that can interfere with judgment of the patient's behavior. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician rating scale (NPI-C) was therefore developed as a comprehensive and versatile instrument to assess and accurately measure neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia, thereby using information from caregiver and patient interviews, and any other relevant available data. The present study is a follow-up to the original, cross-national NPI-C validation, evaluating the reliability and concurrent validity of the NPI-C in quantifying psychopathological symptoms in dementia in a large Brazilian cohort. Methods: Two blinded raters evaluated 312 participants (156 patient-knowledgeable informant dyads) using the NPI-C for a total of 624 observations in five Brazilian centers. Inter-rater reliability was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients for the NPI-C domains and the traditional NPI. Convergent validity included correlations of specific domains of the NPI-C with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Index (CMAI), the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), and the Apathy Inventory (AI). Results: Inter-rater reliability was strong for all NPI-C domains. There were high correlations between NPI-C/delusions and BPRS, NPI-C/apathy-indifference with the AI, NPI-C/depression-dysphoria with the CSDD, NPI-C/agitation with the CMAI, and NPI-C/aggression with the CMAI. There was moderate correlation between the NPI-C/aberrant vocalizations and CMAI and the NPI-C/hallucinations with the BPRS. Conclusion: The NPI-C is a comprehensive tool that provides accurate measurement of NPS in dementia with high concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability in the Brazilian setting. In addition to universal assessment, the NPI-C can be completed by individual domains.
引用
收藏
页码：1503 / 1511
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Ozdel, Kadir
    Kocbiyik, Sibel
    Karadag, Hasan
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [22] The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity
    Kang, Eun-Chan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Seo, Young-Soo
    Jung, Sung-Soo
    Seo, Beom-Joo
    Ryu, Jeoung-Whan
    Shim, Joo-Cheol
    Moon, Jung-Joon
    Jeon, Dong-Wook
    Park, Kyoung-Duck
    Jung, Do-Un
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 14 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [23] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale
    Turan, Nuray
    Asti, Turkinaz Atabek
    Kaya, Nurten
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2017, 40 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [24] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hamilton depression rating scale
    Akdemir, A
    Türkçapar, MG
    Örsel, SD
    Demirergi, N
    Dag, I
    Özbay, MH
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [25] Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Calgary Depression Rating Scale
    Szafranski, T
    Jarema, M
    Ruzikowska, A
    Chóma, ME
    Kukulska, D
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2000, 41 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [26] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    TAN Song
    NIU Hui-xia
    ZHAO Lu
    GAO Yuan
    LU Jia-meng
    SHI Chang-he
    Chandra Avinash
    WANG Rui-hao
    XU Yu-ming
    中华医学杂志（英文版）, 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048
  • [27] Reliability and validity of a Portuguese version of the Young Mania Rating Scale
    Vilela, JAA
    Crippa, JAS
    Del-Ben, CM
    Loureiro, SR
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 38 (09) : 1429 - 1439
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    Tan Song
    Mu Hui-xia
    Zhao Lu
    Gao Yuan
    Lu Jia-meng
    Sri Chang-he
    Avinash, Chandra
    Wang Rui-hao
    Xu Yu-ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048
  • [29] Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the inventory of depressive symptomatology clinician-rated version(K-IDS-C)
    Kwak, K. P.
    Song, C. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 9 : S183 - S183
  • [30] Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients
    Chaves, Marcia Lorena Fagundes
    Camozzato, Ana Luiza
    Godinho, Claudia
    Kochhann, Renata
    Schuh, Artur
    de Almeida, Vanessa Lopes
    Kaye, Jeffrey
    ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2007, 21 (03): : 210 - 217
12345