Biological responses of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to nZVI (Fe0), Fe2+ and Fe3+

被引:48
|
作者
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Shen, Fangxia [1 ]
Yao, Maosheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
来源
RSC ADVANCES | 2013年 / 3卷 / 33期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
VALENT IRON NANOPARTICLES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; CELLULAR TOXICITY; OXIDATIVE STRESS; CARBON NANOTUBES; ZEROVALENT IRON; FERROUS ION; INACTIVATION; WATER; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1039/c3ra40570b
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study investigated the biological responses of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to nZVI particles, Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. Two Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis var. niger and Staphylococcus aureus) and two Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Escherichia coli) were subjected to treatment with nZVI particles (0.56 mg mL(-1) = 0.01 mol Fe/L), Fe2+ (0.01 mol L-1) and Fe3+ (0.01 mol L-1) as well as their combinations with various volumes (10-1000 mu L) under aerobic conditions. The iron and microbial mixtures were also subjected to magnetic separation, viability tests by BacLight kit and surface chemistry analysis by X-ray photoelectron microscopy (XPS). The inactivation was determined using an agar plate CFU counting method, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was also measured. The experimental results revealed that Fe2+ and Fe3+ had stronger inactivation effects on all bacteria tested than nZVI under the experimental conditions; this effect was especially pronounced for E. coli. For nZVI particles of 0.56 mg mL(-1), the bacterial growth was promoted when increasing volume was added, more significantly for S. aureus. In general, the culturing and viability tests showed that Fe2+ had stronger inactivation effects on Gram-negative bacteria, while Fe3+ inactivated more Gram-positive ones. However, the inactivation of the iron combinations was shown to vary greatly with bacterial types. ROS data showed inactivations of bacterial cells could also have resulted from in vivo damage by increased intracellular ROS levels. High magnetic removal efficiencies were observed for bacteria under the conditions tested, except for Gram-positive ones mixed with nZVI particles followed by addition of Fe3+. XPS data showed strikingly different surface chemistry for nZVI particles after reacting with B. subtilis and E. coli, and a more stable form of iron was produced for E. coli. The results from this study implied that the microbial inactivation by nZVI primarily results from Fe2+ and Fe3+ on the particle surface. Depending on their concentration levels, different reactive oxygen species (ROS) combat and survival mechanisms might be initiated by different bacterial types including production of metalloregulatory proteins and ROS scavengers. On the other hand, our study implies that living organisms could actively neutralize environmental oxidative stress.
引用
收藏
页码:13835 / 13842
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic Performance Comparison of Fe3+/Fe0/Peroxymonosulfate and Fe3+/Fe0/Peroxydisulfate Systems for Organics Removal
    Oh, Wen-Da
    Ho, Yeek-Chia
    Mohamad, Mardawani
    Ho, Chii-Dong
    Ravi, Rajiv
    Lim, Jun-Wei
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (18)
  • [32] Synergistic Catalytic Action of Fe0, Fe2+ and Fe3+ in Fenton Reaction for Methyl Orange Decolorization
    Tantiwa, Nidtaya
    Kuntiya, Ampin
    Seesuriyachan, Phisit
    [J]. CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2013, 40 (01): : 60 - 69
  • [33] BIOEFFECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA DISCHARGE ON GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    Motrescu, Iuliana
    Poiata, Antoniea
    Nastuta, Andrei Vasile
    Creanga, Dorina
    Popa, Gheorghe
    [J]. Journal of Science and Arts, 2015, (03): : 249 - 256
  • [34] Gram-positive merA gene in gram-negative oral and urine bacteria
    Ojo, KK
    Tung, D
    Luis, H
    Bernardo, M
    Leitao, J
    Roberts, MC
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 238 (02) : 411 - 416
  • [35] SODIUM-CHLORIDE EFFECT ON GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    SONCINI, G
    PALEARI, MAB
    BERETTA, G
    CANTONI, C
    POLI, G
    [J]. ARCHIVIO VETERINARIO ITALIANO, 1982, 33 (1-2) : 1 - 8
  • [36] THE ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY OF GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA - AN ELECTROKINETIC ANALYSIS
    BAYER, ME
    SLOYER, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 136 : 867 - 874
  • [37] New signaling molecules in some gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
    Vannini, Lucia
    Ndagijimana, Maurice
    Saracino, Pasquale
    Vernocchi, Pamela
    Corsetti, Aldo
    ValliCelli, Melania
    Cappa, Fabrizio
    Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
    Guerzoni, Maria Elisabetta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 120 (1-2) : 25 - 33
  • [38] Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as carrier systems for DNA vaccines
    Dietrich, G
    Kolb-Mäurer, A
    Spreng, S
    Schartl, M
    Goebel, W
    Gentschev, I
    [J]. VACCINE, 2001, 19 (17-19) : 2506 - 2512
  • [39] Patterns of cytokine induction by gram-positive and gram-negative probiotic bacteria
    Cross, ML
    Ganner, A
    Teilab, D
    Fray, LM
    [J]. FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02): : 173 - 180
  • [40] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PENCILLINASES FROM GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    SMITH, JT
    HAMILTONMILLER, JMT
    [J]. NATURE, 1963, 197 (487) : 976 - &