Performance of Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) and Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis Associated with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi

被引:49
|
作者
Fukushima, Hiroshi [1 ]
Kobayashi, Masaki [1 ]
Kawano, Keizo [1 ]
Morimoto, Shinji [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsuchiura Kyodo Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, 4-1-1 Ootsuno, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki 3000028, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2018年 / 199卷 / 06期
关键词
kidney; urinary calculi; sepsis; hospital mortality; decision support techniques; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; SEPTIC SHOCK SEPSIS-3; UROSEPSIS; CRITERIA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.052
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Task Force proposed a new definition of sepsis based on the SOFA (Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment) score and introduced a novel scoring system, quickSOFA, to screen patients at high risk for sepsis. However, the clinical usefulness of these systems is unclear. Therefore, we investigated predictive performance for mortality in patients with acute pyelonephritis associated with upper urinary tract calculi. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients who were clinically diagnosed with acute pyelonephritis associated with upper urinary tract calculi outside the intensive care unit. We evaluated the performance of the quickSOFA, SOFA and SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) scores to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit admission using the AUC of the ROC curve, net reclassification, integrated discrimination improvements and decision curve analysis. Results: A total of 11 patients (8%) died in the hospital and 26 (18%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The AUC of quickSOFA to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit admission was significantly greater than that of SIRS (each p < 0.001) and comparable to that of SOFA (p = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively). When incorporated into the baseline model consisting of patient age, gender and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, quickSOFA and SOFA provided a greater change in AUC, and in net classification and integrated discrimination improvements than SIRS for each outcome. Decision curve analyses revealed that the quickSOFA and SOFA incorporated models showed a superior net benefit compared to the SIRS incorporated model for most examined probabilities of the 2 outcomes. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients with a quickSOFA score of 2 or greater and a SOFA score of 7 or greater, which were the optimal cutoffs determined by the Youden index, was 18% and 28%, respectively. Conclusions: SOFA and quickSOFA are more clinically useful scoring systems than SIRS to predict mortality in patients with acute pyelonephritis associated with upper urinary tract calculi.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1533
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of quick sequential organ failure assessment score-based sepsis clinical decision support system may be helpful to predict sepsis development
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Lee, Jae-Ho
    Lee, Sang-Wook
    Kim, Won Young
    SIGNA VITAE, 2021, 17 (05) : 86 - 94
  • [42] Prehospital quick sequential organ failure assessment as a tool to predict in-hospital mortality
    Miyamoto, Kyohei
    Shibata, Naoaki
    Nakashima, Tsuyoshi
    Kato, Seiya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (10): : 1832 - 1836
  • [43] Performance of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score for prognosis of heat-related hospitalized patients
    Guo, Ying
    Wang, Yongbin
    Ma, Cheng'en
    Li, Rui
    Li, Tao
    HEART & LUNG, 2020, 49 (04): : 415 - 419
  • [44] Re: Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis
    Shi, Qifang
    Zhang, Jinsong
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2023,
  • [45] Sequential organ failure assessment score as the determinant of outcome for patients with severe sepsis
    Vosylius, S
    Sipylaite, J
    Ivaskevicius, J
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 45 (06) : 715 - 720
  • [46] Risk Stratification Tools in Sepsis: From Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment*
    Lee, Jessica T.
    Mikkelsen, Mark E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (08) : 1159 - 1161
  • [47] Relationship between the prehospital quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and prognosis in patients with sepsis or suspected sepsis: a population-based ORION registry
    Hirose, Tomoya
    Katayama, Yusuke
    Ogura, Hiroshi
    Umemura, Yutaka
    Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
    Mizushima, Yasuaki
    Shimazu, Takeshi
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [48] A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection
    Redfern, Oliver C.
    Smith, Gary B.
    Prytherch, David R.
    Meredith, Paul
    Inada-Kim, Matthew
    Schmidt, Paul E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (12) : 1923 - 1933
  • [49] Comparing Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores to End-tidal Carbon Dioxide as Mortality Predictors in Prehospital Patients with Suspected Sepsis
    Hunter, Christopher L.
    Silvestri, Salvatore
    Ralls, George
    Stone, Amanda
    Walker, Ayanna
    Mangalat, Neal
    Papa, Linda
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (03) : 446 - 451
  • [50] Evaluation of the "Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment" to Predict Mortality in Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants
    Kraja, Elvis
    Demirtas, Ferhan
    Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi
    Turker, Nazmiye
    Okulu, Emel
    Erdeve, Oemer
    Atasay, Begum
    Arsan, Saadet
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2024, 228 (02): : 174 - 180