The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed

被引:13
|
作者
Shen, Xi [1 ]
Long, Hui [1 ]
Gao, Hongyuan [1 ]
Guo, Wenya [1 ]
Xie, Yating [1 ]
Chen, Di [1 ]
Cong, Yanyan [1 ]
Wang, Yun [1 ]
Li, Dongying [1 ]
Si, Jiqiang [1 ]
Zhao, Leiwen [1 ]
Lyu, Qifeng [1 ]
Kuang, Yanping [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
frozen embryo transfer; grade "C" blastocyst; cleavage-stage embryo quality; embryo development speed; live birth rate; OVARIAN STIMULATION; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; MORPHOLOGY; CULTURE; IMPLANTATION; DAY-5; INCREASES; AGREEMENT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3389/fphys.2020.01102
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Background It is unclear whether we should focus attention on cleavage-stage embryo quality and embryo development speed when transferring single particular grade vitrified-warmed blastocysts, especially poor-quality blastocysts (grade "C"). Method This retrospective study considered 3386 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from January 2010 to December 2017. They were divided into group 1 (AA/AB/BA,n= 374), group 2 (BB,n= 1789), group 3 (BC,n= 901), and group 4 (CB,n= 322). The effects of cleavage-stage embryo quality and embryo development speed were measured in terms of clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in each group. Results Pregnancy outcomes showed a worsening trend from groups 1 to 4; the proportion of embryos with better cleavage-stage quality and faster development speed decreased. In group 1, only the blastocyst expansion degree 3 was a negative factor in the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.233 [0.091-0.595]) and live birth rate (0.280 [0.093-0.884]). In the other groups (BB, BC, and CB), blastocysts frozen on day 5 had significantly better clinical pregnancy outcomes than those frozen on day 6: 1.373 [1.095-1.722] for group 2, 1.523 [1.055-2.197] for group 3, and 3.627 [1.715-7.671] for group 4. The live birth rate was 1.342 [1.060-1.700] for group 2, 1.544 [1.058-2.253] in group 3, and 3.202 [1.509-6.795] in group 4, allPs < 0.05). The degree of blastocoel expansion three for clinical pregnancy rate in group 2 (0.350 [0.135-0.906],P< 0.05) and day 3 blastomere number (>7) for live birth rate in group 4 (2.455 [1.190-5.063],P< 0.05) were two important factors. Conclusion We should consider choosing BB/BC/CB grade blastocysts frozen on day 5, CB grade blastocysts with day 3 blastomere numbers (>7), and AA/AB/BA grade blastocysts with degrees of expansion (>= 4) to obtain better pregnancy outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Women's age and embryo developmental speed accurately predict clinical pregnancy after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Kato, Keiichi
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Yabuuchi, Akiko
    Uchiyama, Kazuo
    Okuno, Takashi
    Kobayashi, Tamotsu
    Segawa, Tomoya
    Teramoto, Shokichi
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 29 (04) : 411 - 416
  • [22] Effect of laser zona thinning on vitrified-warmed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a prospective, randomized study
    Valojerdi, Mojtaba Rezazadeh
    Eftekhari-Yazdi, Poopak
    Karimian, Leila
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Movaghar, Bahar
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [23] Clinical Usability of Embryo Development Using a Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Approach in a Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer: Assessment of Pre-Vitrified Blastocyst Diameter and Post-Warmed Blastocyst Re-Expansion Speed
    Park, Jae Kyun
    Ahn, So-Yeon
    Seok, Su Hee
    Park, Sol Yi
    Bang, Soyoung
    Eum, Jin Hee
    Kwak, In Pyung
    Kim, Ji Won
    Lee, Woo Sik
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [24] Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy
    Zhu, Qianqian
    Zhu, Jing
    Wang, Yun
    Wang, Bian
    Wang, Ningling
    Yin, Mingru
    Zhang, Suqun
    Lyu, Qifeng
    Kuang, Yanping
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (06) : 892 - 900
  • [25] Annotation-free embryo score calculated by iDAScore® correlated with live birth and has no correlation with neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Ueno, S.
    Berntsen, J.
    Ito, M.
    Okimura, T.
    Kato, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37
  • [26] The impact of serum oestradiol concentration prior to progesterone administration on live birth rate in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles
    Celik, Cem
    Asoglu, Mehmet Resit
    Karakis, Lale Susan
    Findikli, Necati
    Gultomruk, Meral
    Cavkaytar, Sabri
    Bahceci, Mustafa
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 39 (06) : 1026 - 1033
  • [27] Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification
    Kang, Sang Min
    Lee, Sang Won
    Yoon, San Hyun
    Kim, Joo Cheol
    Lim, Jin Ho
    Lee, Seong Goo
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2013, 30 (06) : 779 - 785
  • [28] Does fresh single embryo transfer outcome predict the result of a subsequent vitrified-warmed blastocyst of the same cohort?
    Klement, Anat Hershko
    Tulandi, Togas
    Hasson, Joseph
    Tannus, Samer
    Weitzner, Omer
    Weon-Young, Son
    Wiser, Amir
    Shavit, Tal
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (02) : 323 - 328
  • [29] Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification
    Sang Min Kang
    Sang Won Lee
    San Hyun Yoon
    Joo Cheol Kim
    Jin Ho Lim
    Seong Goo Lee
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2013, 30 : 779 - 785
  • [30] Clinical and pregnancy outcomes of double and single blastocyst transfers related with morphological grades in vitrified-warmed embryo transfer
    Park, Dong Soo
    Kim, Ji Won
    Eum, Jin Hee
    Lee, Woo Sik
    Yoon, Tae Ki
    Lyu, Sang Woo
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (03): : 398 - 402