Resampling model of the complement component functional assay: Are we measuring what we think we are measuring?

被引:0
|
作者
Pavlov, Igor Y. [1 ]
Delgado, Julio C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, ARUP Inst Clin & Expt Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Complement system; Functional assay; Resampling model;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2013.02.036
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Complement component functional assay employs mix of the patient serum and serum depleted by the component of interest. To verify that such assay does actually measure functional activity of that component, authors introduced the simple resampling model of the functional test. Methods: Virtual experiment of the functional test model consists of random sampling of component concentrations for depleted and patient sera. It was assumed that all complement components have Gaussian distribution, and the lowest component concentration determines the outcome of the assay. This outcome was compared with the chosen concentration of the target component. The goal was to evaluate how often and under which conditions our virtual experiment results were not determined by the component of interest. Results: We could only underestimate functional activity of the complement component of interest. Underestimation could happen only when functional activity of the component of interest is above the population average multiplied by the ratio of depleted to patient serum volumes. Conclusions: The chance to underestimate functional activity of the component is low for the real-life component distribution for the assay volume ratio 2:1, and practically absent for higher assay ratios. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 90
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What are we measuring? COMMENT
    Lienard, Pierre
    Martinez, Matthew
    Moncrieff, Michael
    RELIGION BRAIN & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 3 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [22] We are what we think
    不详
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 33 (05) : P1 - +
  • [23] We Are What We (Think We) Eat
    Sabiston, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2009, 45 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [24] Exploring How Gender and Sex Are Measured in Criminology and Victimology: Are we Measuring What we Say we Are Measuring?
    Crittenden, Courtney A.
    Gateley, Hannah C.
    Policastro, Christina N.
    McGuffee, Karen
    WOMEN & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2022, 32 (1-2) : 205 - 218
  • [25] WHEN DO THE MEASURES OF KNOWLEDGE MEASURE WHAT WE THINK THEY ARE MEASURING
    KANWAR, R
    GRUND, L
    OLSON, JC
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1990, 17 : 603 - 608
  • [26] Rotten Apples or Bad Harvest? What We Are Measuring When We Are Measuring Abuse
    Tajalizadehkhoob, Samaneh
    Boehme, Rainer
    Ganan, Carlos
    Korczynski, Maciej
    van Eeten, Michel
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 18 (04)
  • [27] Malnutrition in Spine Oncology: Where Are We and What Are We Measuring?
    Ramos, Rafael de la Garza
    Charest-Morin, Raphaele
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Laufer, Ilya
    Dea, Nicolas
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Rhines, Laurence D.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    Versteeg, Anne L.
    Chen, Hanbo
    Cordula, Netzer
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    O'Toole, John E.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Kumar, Naresh
    Disch, Alexander C.
    Stephens, Byron
    Goldschlager, Tony
    Weber, Michael H.
    Shin, John H.
    AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (1_SUPPL) : 29S - 46S
  • [28] Are We Making the Correct Inferences Based on What We Are Measuring?
    Fulk, George
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 45 (04): : 243 - 245
  • [29] What are we measuring when we measure the fear of crime
    Kury, H
    Lichtblau, A
    Neumaier, A
    KRIMINALISTIK, 2004, 58 (07): : 457 - 465
  • [30] What we think and what we know
    Buse, J
    Raftery, L
    DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (10) : 1876 - 1878