Grain growth competition during melt pool solidification - Comparing phase-field and cellular automaton models

被引:21
|
作者
Elahi, S. M. [1 ,2 ]
Tavakoli, R. [2 ]
Romero, I. [1 ,2 ]
Tourret, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETS Ingn Ind, Madrid, Spain
[2] IMDEA Mat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Solidification; Microstructure; Modeling; Crystal growth phase-field; Cellular automata; Additive manufacturing; COLUMNAR DENDRITIC GRAINS; DIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION; CONVERGING DENDRITES; TEXTURE EVOLUTION; SIMULATION; PREDICTION; MICROSTRUCTURES; ALLOY; INTERFACE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111882
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A broad range of computational models have been proposed to predict microstructure development during solidification processing but they have seldom been compared to each other on a quantitative and systematic basis. In this paper, we compare phase-field (PF) and cellular automaton (CA) simulations of polycrystalline growth in a two-dimensional melt pool under conditions relevant to additive manufacturing (powder-bed fusion). We compare the resulting grain structures using local (point-by-point) measurements, as well as averaged grain orientation distributions over several simulations. We explore the effect of the CA spatial discretization level and that of the melt pool aspect ratio upon the selected grain texture. Our simulations show that detailed microscopic features related to transient growth conditions and solid-liquid interface stability (e.g. the initial planar growth stage prior to its cellular/dendritic destabilization, or the early elimination of unfavorably oriented grains due to neighbor grain sidebranching) can only be captured by PF simulations. The resulting disagreement between PF and CA predictions can only be addressed partially by a refinement of the CA grid. However, overall grain distributions averaged over the entire melt pools of several simulations seem to lead to a notably better agreement between PF and CA, with some variability with the melt pool shape and CA grid. While further research remains required, in particular to identify the appropriate selection of CA spatial discretization and its link to characteristic microstructural length scales, this research provides a useful step forward in this direction by comparing both methods quantitatively at process-relevant length and time scales.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phase-field modeling of faceted growth in solidification of alloys
    Xing, Hui
    An, Qi
    Dong, Xianglei
    Han, Yongsheng
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [42] Accuracy Evaluation of Phase-field Models for Grain Growth Simulation with Anisotropic Grain Boundary Properties
    Miyoshi, Eisuke
    Takaki, Tomohiro
    Ohno, Munekazu
    Shibuta, Yasushi
    ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 60 (01) : 160 - 167
  • [43] Rotation-induced grain growth and stagnation in phase-field crystal models
    Bjerre, Mathias
    Tarp, Jens M.
    Angheluta, Luiza
    Mathiesen, Joachim
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 88 (02):
  • [44] Modeling the topological features during grain growth by cellular automaton
    Raghavan, S.
    Sahay, Satyam S.
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2009, 46 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [45] PHASE-FIELD MODEL OF SOLUTE TRAPPING DURING SOLIDIFICATION
    WHEELER, AA
    BOETTINGER, WJ
    MCFADDEN, GB
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1993, 47 (03) : 1893 - 1909
  • [46] Comparison of Cellular Automaton and Phase Field Models to Simulate Dendrite Growth in Hexagonal Crystals
    Zaeem, Mohsen Asle
    Yin, Hebi
    Felicelli, Sergio D.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (02) : 137 - 146
  • [47] Comparison of Cellular Automaton and Phase Field Models to Simulate Dendrite Growth in Hexagonal Crystals
    Mohsen Asle Zaeem
    Sergio D.Felicelli
    JournalofMaterialsScience&Technology, 2012, 28 (02) : 137 - 146
  • [48] Explicit temperature coupling in phase-field crystal models of solidification
    Punke, Maik
    Wise, Steven M.
    Voigt, Axel
    Salvalaglio, Marco
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 30 (07)
  • [49] Reduced order methods for the solution of solidification Phase-Field models
    Lopez-Quiroga, E.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (02): : 637 - 642
  • [50] Fluid flow and pressure effects in phase-field models for solidification
    Conti, M.
    Fluid Structure Interaction and Moving Boundary Problems IV, 2007, 92 : 281 - 288