Myocardial contractile reserve and perfusion defect severity with rest and stress dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT in canine stunning and subendocardial infarction

被引:0
|
作者
Chin, BB
Esposito, G
Kraitchman, DL
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Johns Hopkins Outpatient Ctr, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] CNR, Ctr Studio Med Nucl, I-80125 Naples, Italy
关键词
myocardial infarction; myocardial stunning; Tc-99m-sestamibi; contractile reserve; myocardial viability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Myocarcial contractile reserve and resting perfusion scintigraphy provide independent information to assess myocardial viability. The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate both with Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT and low-dose dobutamine in canine stunning and subendocardial infarction (SEMI), Methods: Eighteen dogs were included in the study: 7 normal, 7 stunned, and 4 with SEMI. Closed-chest stunning and SEMI were produced by angioplasty balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (20 and 90 min, respectively). Subsequent radiolabeled mircospheres confirmed reflow, and Tc-19m-sestamibi was then administered at rest. Gated SPECT and MRI tagging were performed at rest and during low-dose dobutamine infusion (5 mug/kg/min). SPECT systolic wall thickening index (SWI) and MRI radial strain quantified myocardial contraction. Postmortem 2,3,5.-triphenyltetrazolium chloride quantified SEMI. Results: Defect severity by SPECT in the anterior wall was mild and was not statistically different for the stunned versus SEMI groups (P = not significant). At rest, anterior wall SPECT SWI was significantly higher in the normal versus stunned groups (21.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 10.1 +/- 9.0; P = 0.0002) and the normal versus SEMI groups (21.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 6.0; F) = 0.000002). With low-dose dobutamine, SWl increased significantly compared with rest for the stunned group (29.1 +/- 10.4 vs. 10.1 +/- 9.0; P = 0.000007) but did not increase significantly for the SEMI group (11.0 +/- 11.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 6.0; P = 0.09); SWl during low-dose dobutamine infusion for the stunned group was comparable to that for the normal group (29.1 +/- 10.4 vs. 28.2 +/- 7,0; P = 0.80). SWI also showed correlation with MRI radial strain (r := 0.42, P = 0.00015). Conclusion: Defect severity for stunned myccardium and SEMI was mild and was not significantly different. Contractile reserve was significantly different in stunned rnyocardium and SEMI. Tc-99m-Sestamibi SPECT at rest and with low-dose dobutamine is a promising new technique to simultaneously assess myocardial perfusion and contractile reserve.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 550
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Personalization of 99mTc-sestamibi activity in SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging with the cardiofocal SmartZoom® collimator
    Verrecchia-Ramos, Emilie
    Morel, Olivier
    Beauchat, Valerie
    Denet, Sylvie
    Sidikou, Abdourahamane Djibo
    Ginet, Merwan
    Pfletschinger, Estelle
    Teodor, Luminita
    Trombowsky, Maud
    Verdier, Jeany
    Vere, Christelle
    Retif, Paul
    Ben Mahmoud, Sinan
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [22] The significance of 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial SPECT after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Akashi, Yoshihiro Y.
    Izumo, M.
    Sekizuka, H.
    Ishibashi, Y.
    Yoneyama, K.
    Nishio, S.
    Suzuki, K.
    Miyake, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 11 (0B) : S62 - S63
  • [23] Increased Washout of 99mTc-Sestamibi Would Reflect Impaired Myocardial Contractile and Relaxation Reserve During Dobutamine Stress Due to Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients
    Hayashi, Daisuke
    Ohshima, Satoru
    Isobe, Satoshi
    Cheng Xianwu
    Shinoda, Norihiro
    Okumura, Takahiro
    Hirashiki, Akihiro
    Unno, Kazumasa
    Murohara, Toyoaki
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [24] Suitability of 99mTc-teboroxime CZT SPECT for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging - comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi in mice.
    Thackeray, James
    Wittneben, Alexander
    Wang, Yong
    Wollert, Kai
    Ross, Tobias
    Bengel, Frank
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57
  • [25] Eleven-Year Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress 99mTc-Sestamibi Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Limited Exercise Capacity
    Boiten, Hendrik J.
    van Domburg, Ron T.
    Valkema, Roelf
    Schinkel, Arend F. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (07): : 884 - 889
  • [26] Investigation of the Clinical Efficacy of 99mTC-Sestamibi Washout in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Comparison with Stress Myocardial Imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi Using a Two-Day Protocol
    Ota, Mieko
    Hyodo, Fuminori
    Matsuo, Shinro
    Kato, Takashi
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Nakamura, Fumihiko
    Fujimorto, Keita
    Kaneko, Yo
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02)
  • [27] Systematic evaluation of 99mTc-tetrofosmin versus 99mTc-sestamibi to study murine myocardial perfusion in small animal SPECT/CT
    Alexis Vrachimis
    Sven Hermann
    Domokos Máthé
    Otmar Schober
    Michael Schäfers
    EJNMMI Research, 2
  • [28] Feasibility of simultaneous stress 99mTc-sestamibi/rest 201T1 dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease
    Nakamura, M
    Takeda, K
    Ichihara, T
    Motomura, N
    Shimizu, H
    Saito, Y
    Nomura, Y
    Isaka, N
    Konishi, T
    Nakano, T
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 40 (06) : 895 - 903
  • [29] Systematic evaluation of 99mTc-tetrofosmin versus 99mTc-sestamibi to study murine myocardial perfusion in small animal SPECT/CT
    Vrachimis, Alexis
    Hermann, Sven
    Mathe, Domokos
    Schober, Otmar
    Schaefers, Michael
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2012, 2
  • [30] Incidentally recognised thyroid focal uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi during stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
    Giejda, Krzysztof
    Piszczek, Stanislaw
    Stembrowicz-Nowakowska, Zofia
    Saracyn, Marek
    Dziuk, Miroslaw
    Kaminski, Grzegorz
    ENDOKRYNOLOGIA POLSKA, 2015, 66 (06) : 521 - 525