A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice

被引:6
|
作者
Khoury, Julie [1 ]
Krejany, Catherine J. [2 ]
Versteeg, Roald W. [1 ]
Lodewyckx, Michaela A. [3 ]
Pike, Simone R. [1 ]
Civil, Michael S. [4 ]
Jiwa, Moyez [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Australian Coll Gen Practitioners, Policy Practice & Innovat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Melbourne Clin Sch, Sch Med Sydney, Werribee, Vic, Australia
[3] North West Melbourne Primary Hlth Network, Hlth Syst Integrat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Royal Australian Coll Gen Practitioners, Policy Practice & Innovat, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Delphi technique; general practice; health care; primary care; quality assurance; quality improvement; quality of health care; HEALTH-CARE; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; ACCREDITATION;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmy049
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017. The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally. A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board. Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition. The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 171
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Developing a framework for managing academic standards, quality and enhancement: addressing concerns and embedding good practice
    Drowley, Melinda
    Marshall, Helen
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2014, 9 : 83 - 95
  • [33] The development of professional practice standards for Australian general practice nurses
    Halcomb, Elizabeth
    Stephens, Moira
    Bryce, Julianne
    Foley, Elizabeth
    Ashley, Christine
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (08) : 1958 - 1969
  • [34] Emergency general surgery verification: Quality improvement and the case for optimal resources and process standards
    Coleman, Jamie J.
    Davis, Kimberly A.
    Savage, Stephanie A.
    Staudenmayer, Kristin
    Coimbra, Raul
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2024, 96 (01): : E1 - E4
  • [35] Minor surgery in general practice - setting the standards
    Finn, L
    Crook, S
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (02): : 169 - 174
  • [36] The uses and implications of standards in general practice consultations
    Lippert, Maria Laura
    Reventlow, Susanne
    Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom
    HEALTH, 2017, 21 (01): : 3 - 20
  • [37] Standards for quality: Theory tested by practice
    Plushchevskij, M.
    Standarty i Kachestvo, 2004, (05): : 84 - 92
  • [38] Design and minimum standards for modern general practice
    Hynes, T
    IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 92 (02) : 262 - 262
  • [39] An iterative process of global quality improvement: the International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010
    Merry, Alan F.
    Cooper, Jeffrey B.
    Soyannwo, Olaitan
    Wilson, Iain H.
    Eichhorn, John H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2010, 57 (11): : 1021 - 1026
  • [40] An iterative process of global quality improvement: the International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010
    Alan F. Merry
    Jeffrey B. Cooper
    Olaitan Soyannwo
    Iain H. Wilson
    John H. Eichhorn
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2010, 57 : 1021 - 1026