An exploration of incorporating site response into PSHA-Part I: Issues related to site response analysis methods

被引:23
|
作者
Papaspiliou, Myrto [1 ]
Kontoe, Stavroula [1 ]
Bommer, Julian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.011
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents a series of analyses for the evaluation of the ground response of two NEHRP class D sites, subjected to shaking by a large number of strong ground-motion records. The two investigated sites have very distinct profiles, but they are characterised by almost identical V-s30 values. The site response analyses are performed using various methods of analysis and input parameters in order to explore the sensitivity of the ground response estimates and to identify the dominating parameters. Equivalent linear analysis is performed using different sets of dynamic soil properties curves, while nonlinear analysis is performed using different target dynamic soil curves, viscous damping formulations and fitting procedures for the constitutive model parameters. Particular focus is given to the sensitivity of the response when soil sites are subjected to high-intensity shaking, a subject of particular interest when the prediction of surface ground motions with low annual probabilities of exceedance is the target of probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA). The site response analysis results of this paper are incorporated into the probabilistic framework of Bazzurro and Cornell [1] in our companion paper in order to assess their impact on the final soil surface hazard calculation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 315
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of the Upper Part of the Soil Profile on the Site Response
    Kalinina, A. V.
    Ammosov, S. M.
    Bykova, V. V.
    Tatevossian, R. E.
    SEISMIC INSTRUMENTS, 2018, 54 (04) : 499 - 513
  • [22] Effect of the Upper Part of the Soil Profile on the Site Response
    A. V. Kalinina
    S. M. Ammosov
    V. V. Bykova
    R. E. Tatevossian
    Seismic Instruments, 2018, 54 (4) : 499 - 513
  • [23] Implications of Site Specific Response Analysis
    Ansal, Atilla
    Tonuk, Gokce
    Kurtulus, Asli
    RECENT ADVANCES IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING IN EUROPE, 2018, 46 : 51 - 68
  • [24] A hypoplastic model for site response analysis
    Reyes, D. K.
    Rodriguez-Marek, A.
    Lizcano, A.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (01) : 173 - 184
  • [25] Site-specific ground response analysis
    GovindaRaju, L
    Ramana, GV
    HanumanthaRao, C
    Sitharam, TG
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (10): : 1354 - 1362
  • [26] Site response analysis in performance based approach
    Ansal, Atilla
    Tonuk, Gokce
    Sadeghzadeh, Shima
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 178
  • [27] Soil and site characterization for seismic response analysis
    Pitilakis, KD
    Anastasiadis, AJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: INVITED LECTURES, 1999, : 65 - 90
  • [28] Stochastic 1D site response analysis at a site in central Italy
    Rota, M.
    Lai, C. G.
    Strobbia, C. L.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (04) : 626 - 639
  • [29] Influence of Input Motion and Site Property Variabilities on Seismic Site Response Analysis
    Rathje, Ellen M.
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Trent, Whitney L.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (04) : 607 - 619
  • [30] Advance in seismic site response: Usual practices and innovative methods
    Panzera, Francesco
    D'Amico, Sebastiano
    Burjanek, Jan
    Pischiutta, Marta
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2017, 98 : 1 - 2