A Review of The Convexification Methods for AC Optimal Power Flow

被引:5
|
作者
Huang, Shaojun [1 ]
Filonenko, Konstantin [1 ]
Veje, Christian T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Energy Informat, Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Inst, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
关键词
AC optimal power flow; convex relaxation; convex hull; exactness; semidefinite programming; second order cone programming; CONVEX RELAXATION; SDP RELAXATION; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1109/epec47565.2019.9074824
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper reviews existing convexification methods for AC optimal power flow (OPF), which is normally nonlinear, nonconvex, and very hard to solve. Different types of convexification methods are reviewed, from conventional methods like DC OPF, to relaxation methods, like convex relaxation (semidefinite program - SDP, second order cone program - SOCP, quadratic convex - QC), strengthened convex relaxation, and convex hull, and finally convex restriction methods. The focus is given to relaxation methods due to the great attention in recent research. The exactness of the relaxation methods and the sufficient conditions that guarantee the exactness are reviewed as well. This gives an insight into these relaxation methods and helps to select suitable and efficient relaxation method for different applications.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Learning to accelerate globally optimal solutions to the AC Optimal Power Flow problem
    Cengil, Fatih
    Nagarajan, Harsha
    Bent, Russell
    Eksioglu, Sandra
    Eksioglu, Burak
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2022, 212
  • [42] Parallel Implementation of AC Optimal Power Flow and Time Constrained Optimal Power Flow using High Performance Computing
    Werner, Alex
    Duwadi, Kapil
    Stegmeier, Nicholas
    Hansen, Timothy M.
    Kimn, Jung-Han
    2019 IEEE 9TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2019, : 597 - 602
  • [43] Restoring AC Power Flow Feasibility from Relaxed and Approximated Optimal Power Flow Models
    Taheri, Babak
    Molzahn, Daniel K.
    2023 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, ACC, 2023, : 4463 - 4470
  • [44] Using AC Optimal Power Flow for DG Planning and Optimisation
    Ochoa, Luis F.
    Harrison, Gareth P.
    IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING 2010, 2010,
  • [45] Chance Constraints for Improving the Security of AC Optimal Power Flow
    Lubin, M.
    Dvorkin, Y.
    Roald, L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (03) : 1908 - 1917
  • [46] Dynamic security constrained AC optimal power flow for microgrids
    Alvarez, Washington S.
    Lopez, Juan Camilo
    Liederer, Fernando W.
    Dotta, Daniel
    Rider, Marcos J.
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2024, 236
  • [47] Equivalent Circuit Formulation for Solving AC Optimal Power Flow
    Jereminov, Marko
    Pandey, Amritanshu
    Pileggi, Larry
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (03) : 2354 - 2365
  • [48] Evaluation of AC optimal power flow on graphical processing units
    Abhyankar, Shrirang
    Peles, Slaven
    Rutherford, Robert
    Mancinelli, Asher
    2021 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2021,
  • [49] Convex Relaxations of Chance Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow
    Venzke, Andreas
    Halilbasic, Lejla
    Markovic, Uros
    Hug, Gabriela
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    2018 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2018,
  • [50] A learning-augmented approach for AC optimal power flow
    Rahman, Jubeyer
    Feng, Cong
    Zhang, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 130