Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery

被引:48
|
作者
Lipschuetz, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Sarah M. [1 ]
Israel, Ariel [3 ]
Baron, Joel [6 ]
Porat, Shay [1 ]
Valsky, Dan V. [1 ]
Yagel, Oren [1 ]
Amsalem, Hagai [1 ]
Kabiri, Doron [1 ]
Gilboa, Yinon [4 ,5 ]
Sivan, Eyal [4 ,5 ]
Unger, Ron [2 ]
Schiff, Eyal [4 ,5 ]
Hershkovitz, Reli [6 ]
Yagel, Simcha [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Med Ctr, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Mina & Everard Goodman Fac Life Sci, Ramat Gan, Israel
[3] Clalit Hlth Serv, Dept Family Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Soroka Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
cesarean delivery; estimated fetal weight; fetal head circumference; instrumental delivery; primipara; CLIFF-EDGE MODEL; LABOR; MACROSOMIA; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATION; ACCURACY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.230
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Persistently high rates of cesarean deliveries are cause for concern for physicians, patients, and health systems. Prelabor assessment might be refined by identifying factors that help predict an individual patient's risk of cesarean delivery. Such factors may contribute to patient safety and satisfaction as well as health system planning and resource allocation. In an earlier study, neonatal head circumference was shown to be more strongly associated with delivery mode and other outcome measures than neonatal birthweight. OBJECTIVE: In the present study we aimed to evaluate the association of sonographically measured fetal head circumference measured within 1 week of delivery with delivery mode. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter electronic medical record-based study of birth outcomes of primiparous women with term (37-42 weeks) singleton fetuses presenting for ultrasound with fetal biometry within 1 week of delivery. Fetal head circumference and estimated fetal weight were correlated with maternal background, obstetric, and neonatal outcome parameters. Elective cesarean deliveries were excluded. Multinomial regression analysis provided adjusted odds ratios for instrumental delivery and unplanned cesarean delivery when the fetal head circumference was >= 35 cm or estimated fetal weight >= 3900 g, while controlling for possible confounders. RESULTS: In all, 11,500 cases were collected; 906 elective cesarean deliveries were excluded. A fetal head circumference >= 35 cm increased the risk for unplanned cesarean delivery: 174 fetuses with fetal head circumference >= 35 cm (32%) were delivered by cesarean, vs 1712 (17%) when fetal head circumference <35 cm (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-.03). A fetal head circumference >= 35 cm increased the risk of instrumental delivery (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-.88), while estimated fetal weight >= 3900 g tended to reduce it (nonsignificant). Multinomial regression analysis showed that fetal head circumference >= 35 cm increased the risk of unplanned cesarean delivery by an adjusted odds ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-.18) controlling for gestational age, fetal gender, and epidural anesthesia. The rate of prolonged second stage of labor was significantly increased when either the fetal head circumference was >= 35 cm or the estimated fetal weight >= 3900 g, from 22.7% in the total cohort to 31.0%. A fetal head circumference >= 35 cm was associated with a higher rate of 5-minute Apgar score <= 7:9 (1.7%) vs 63 (0.6%) of infants with fetal head circumference <35 cm (P = .01). The rate among fetuses with an estimated fetal weight >= 3900 g was not significantly increased. The rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSION: Sonographic fetal head circumference >= 35 cm, measured within 1 week of delivery, is an independent risk factor for unplanned cesarean delivery but not instrumental delivery. Both fetal head circumference >= 35 cm and estimated fetal weight >= 3900 g significantly increased the risk of a prolonged second stage of labor. Fetal head circumference measurement in the last days before delivery may be an important adjunct to estimated fetal weight in labor management.
引用
收藏
页码:339.e1 / 339.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: Rate and risk factors
    Chauhan, SP
    Magann, EF
    Scott, JR
    Scardo, JA
    Hendrix, NW
    Martin, JN
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2003, 58 (05) : 337 - 350
  • [32] Large uterine leiomyomata and risk of cesarean delivery
    Vergani, Patrizia
    Locatelli, Anna
    Ghidini, Alessandro
    Andreani, Marianna
    Sala, Francesca
    Pezzullo, John C.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02): : 410 - 414
  • [33] A fetal head circumference above the 90th centile is a significant risk factor for cesarean delivery and complicated labor: results from the prospective multicenter Genesis Study
    Burke, Naomi
    Burke, Gerry
    Breathnach, Fionnuala
    McAuliffe, Fionnuala
    Morrison, John
    Turner, Michael
    Dornan, Samina
    Higgins, John
    Cotter, Amanda
    Geary, Michael
    Cody, Fiona
    Mulcahy, Cecelia
    Daly, Sean
    Dicker, Patrick
    Tully, Elizabeth
    Malone, Fergal D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S197 - S197
  • [34] New Sonographic Method for Fetuses with a Large Abdominal Circumference Improves Fetal Weight Estimation
    Kehl, S.
    Koerber, C.
    Hart, N.
    Goecke, T. W.
    Schild, R. L.
    Siemer, J.
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2012, 33 (03): : 265 - 269
  • [35] Can sonographic fetal head circumference measurement help predict obstetric anal sphincter injury?
    Ortega, Marcus, V
    Kim, Youngwu
    Leung, Katherine
    Weinstein, Milena
    Leftwich, Heidi K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (01) : 279 - 283
  • [37] Assessment of Fetal Head Position and Primary Cesarean Delivery Rate.
    DeBolt, Chelsea
    Craffey, Maya
    O'Sullivan, David
    Mullins, Jessica
    Borgida, Adam
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 25 : 215A - 216A
  • [38] Ultrasound assessment of fetal head circumference at the onset of labor as a predictor of operative delivery
    Ooi, Poh Vei
    Ramphul, Meenakshi
    Said, Soha
    Burke, Gerard
    Kennelly, Mairead M.
    Murphy, Deirdre J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (18): : 2182 - 2186
  • [39] Admission fetal heart tracing category and risk of cesarean delivery
    Farishta, Anisha
    Tolcher, Mary C.
    Eppes, Catherine S.
    Clark, Steven L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S497 - S497
  • [40] Risk factors for fetal acidemia at time of scheduled cesarean delivery
    Bligard, Katherine H.
    Cameo, Tamara
    McCallum, Kaitlin
    Rubin, Alexandra
    Rimsza, Rebecca R.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Raghuraman, Nandini
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S691 - S692