A protocol specialized for microbial DNA extraction from living poplar wood

被引:0
|
作者
Li Yu, Xiao [1 ]
Hu, Xing Yi [2 ]
Wang, Xiu Xiu [1 ]
Zhang, Xin Ye [2 ]
DU, Ke Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Hort & Forestry Sci, Hubei Engn Technol Res Ctr Forestry Informat, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Acad Forestry, Wuhan 430075, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bacterial DNA; DNA quality; fungal DNA; Populus; wet heartwood; RAPID EXTRACTION; SOIL METAGENOME; FUNGAL DNA; DIVERSITY; WETWOOD; HEARTWOOD; IDENTIFICATION; COMMUNITIES; ADSORPTION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.15835/nbha50412822
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Microbial DNA extraction is a critical step in metagenomic research. High contents of chemical substances in wood tissues always cause low microbial DNA yield and quality. Up to date, almost no specialized methods involved in microbial DNA extraction from living wood were reported. In this study, an improved protocol (M1) concerning microbial DNA extraction from living poplar wood was developed. We compared microbial DNA yield and quality by M1 with those by other seven methods, including PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (M2), two soil microbial DNA extraction methods (M3 and M4), poplar genomic DNA extraction method from wood (M5), and microbial DNA extraction method from herb stems (M6), isolating bacteria (M7) and isolating fungus (M8). Results showed that M1 yielded much better quality and concentration of microbial DNA than the other methods (M2-M8) from both poplar wetwood and sapwood tissues. Following M1 protocol, 1 g of wetwood sample could yield 272.27 ng/ul (vol=50 ul) pure microbial DNA with the absorption ratios of 1.87 (A260/A230) and 1.66 (A260/A280). For 1 g of sapwood sample, these values were 361.83 ng/ul, 1.85 and 2.24, respectively. These DNA could be stably visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and amplified by primer sets of bacteria (16S V3-V4, 16S-V4, 16S V4-V5) and fungus (ITS1, ITS2). While, the other seven methods only obtained less or contaminated microbial DNA, which could not be amplified stably by aforementioned primer sets. Our protocol provided an approach for microbial community study in living poplar wood in a more accurate way by molecular biology techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A convenient protocol for extraction and purification of DNA from Fragaria
    Mercado, JA
    El Mansouri, I
    Jiménez-Bermúdez, S
    Plieco-Alfaro, F
    Quesada, MA
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 1999, 35 (02) : 152 - 153
  • [22] A PROTOCOL FOR DNA FRAGMENT EXTRACTION FROM POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS
    DYBCZYNSKI, I
    PLUCIENNICZAK, A
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 1988, 6 (10) : 924 - 926
  • [23] PROBLEMS OF TEXTILE CELLULOSE PRODUCTION FROM POPLAR WOOD BY BISULFITE PROCESS WITH LOW EXTRACTION VALUES
    MAGISTER, G
    ZELLSTOFF UND PAPIER, 1969, 18 (05): : 151 - &
  • [24] EASILY HYDRATING PULP FROM POPLAR WOOD
    FRIES, KW
    TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION PAPERS, 1946, 29 (JUN): : 243 - 245
  • [25] SULFATE PULPS FROM POPLAR INDUSTRIAL WOOD
    DIX, B
    ROFFAEL, E
    HOLZ ALS ROH-UND WERKSTOFF, 1989, 47 (09) : 372 - 372
  • [26] NSSC-PULPS FROM POPLAR WOOD
    DIX, B
    ROFFAEL, E
    HOLZ ALS ROH-UND WERKSTOFF, 1989, 47 (11) : 437 - 445
  • [27] Comparison of extraction methods of total microbial DNA from freshwater
    Li, P.
    Yang, S. F.
    Lv, B. B.
    Zhao, K.
    Lin, M. F.
    Zhou, S.
    Song, X.
    Tang, X. M.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 14 (01) : 730 - 738
  • [28] Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from microbial mats
    Bey, Benjamin S.
    Fichot, Erin B.
    Dayama, Gargi
    Decho, Alan W.
    Norman, R. Sean
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2010, 49 (03) : 631 - +
  • [29] Methods for microbial DNA extraction from soil for PCR amplification
    Yeates C.
    Gillings M.R.
    Davison A.D.
    Altavilla N.
    Veal D.A.
    Biological Procedures Online, 1998, 1 (1) : 40 - 47
  • [30] Microbial Total DNA Extraction and Purification from Aerobic Compost
    Kan Jinsong
    Wu Ke
    Nelles, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER, 2012, : 546 - 549