A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment

被引:19
|
作者
Chiribella, Giulio [3 ]
D'Ariano, Giacomo Mauro [1 ,2 ]
Perinotti, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Schlingemann, Dirk [4 ]
Werner, Reinhard [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dipartimento Fis, QUIT Grp, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Pavia, Grp 4, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Quantum Informat, Inst Interdisciplinary Informat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] ISI Fdn, Quantum Informat Theory Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Theoret Phys, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quantum protocols; Quantum combs; Quantum bit commitment; THEOREM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.045
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Bit commitment protocols, whose security is based on the laws of quantum mechanics alone, are generally held to be impossible on the basis of a concealment-bindingness tradeoff (Lo and Chau, 1997 [1], Mayers, 1997 [2]). A strengthened and explicit impossibility proof has been given in D'Ariano et al. (2007) [3] in the Heisenberg picture and in a C*-algebraic framework, considering all conceivable protocols in which both classical and quantum information is exchanged. In the present Letter we provide a new impossibility proof in the Schrodinger picture, greatly simplifying the classification of protocols and strategies using the mathematical formulation in terms of quantum combs (Chiribella et al., 2008 [4]), with each single-party strategy represented by a conditioned comb. We prove that assuming a stronger notion of concealment-for each classical communication history, not in average-allows Alice's cheat to pass also the worst-case Bob's test. The present approach allows us to restate the concealment-bindingness tradeoff in terms of the continuity of dilations of probabilistic quantum combs with the metric given by the comb discriminability-distance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1087
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantum bit commitment in a channel with noise
    Molotkov, SN
    Nazin, SS
    JETP LETTERS, 2001, 73 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [22] Optimal bounds for quantum bit commitment
    Chailloux, Andre
    Kerenidis, Iordanis
    2011 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2011), 2011, : 354 - 362
  • [23] Is quantum bit commitment really possible?
    Lo, HK
    Chau, HF
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1997, 78 (17) : 3410 - 3413
  • [24] A Private Quantum Bit String Commitment
    Gama, Mariana
    Mateus, Paulo
    Souto, Andre
    ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [25] Quantum bit commitment with a composite evidence
    Srikanth, R
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2004, 70 (06) : 343 - 346
  • [26] Cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment
    Hardy, L
    Kent, A
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 92 (15) : 157901 - 1
  • [27] Quantum bit commitment on IBM QX
    Almubayedh, Dhoha A.
    Alazman, Ghadeer
    Alkhalis, Mashael
    Alabdali, Manal
    Nagy, Naya
    Nagy, Marius
    Tatar, Ahmet Emin
    Alfosail, Malak
    Rahman, Atta
    AlMubairik, Norah
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2020, 19 (02)
  • [28] Quantum bit commitment on IBM QX
    Dhoha A. Almubayedh
    Ghadeer Alazman
    Mashael Alkhalis
    Manal Alabdali
    Naya Nagy
    Marius Nagy
    Ahmet Emin Tatar
    Malak Alfosail
    Atta Rahman
    Norah AlMubairik
    Quantum Information Processing, 2020, 19
  • [29] Deterministic relativistic quantum bit commitment
    Adlam, Emily
    Kent, Adrian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2015, 13 (05)
  • [30] Practical quantum bit commitment protocol
    Ariel Danan
    Lev Vaidman
    Quantum Information Processing, 2012, 11 : 769 - 775