A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment

被引:19
|
作者
Chiribella, Giulio [3 ]
D'Ariano, Giacomo Mauro [1 ,2 ]
Perinotti, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Schlingemann, Dirk [4 ]
Werner, Reinhard [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dipartimento Fis, QUIT Grp, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Pavia, Grp 4, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Quantum Informat, Inst Interdisciplinary Informat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] ISI Fdn, Quantum Informat Theory Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Theoret Phys, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quantum protocols; Quantum combs; Quantum bit commitment; THEOREM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.045
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Bit commitment protocols, whose security is based on the laws of quantum mechanics alone, are generally held to be impossible on the basis of a concealment-bindingness tradeoff (Lo and Chau, 1997 [1], Mayers, 1997 [2]). A strengthened and explicit impossibility proof has been given in D'Ariano et al. (2007) [3] in the Heisenberg picture and in a C*-algebraic framework, considering all conceivable protocols in which both classical and quantum information is exchanged. In the present Letter we provide a new impossibility proof in the Schrodinger picture, greatly simplifying the classification of protocols and strategies using the mathematical formulation in terms of quantum combs (Chiribella et al., 2008 [4]), with each single-party strategy represented by a conditioned comb. We prove that assuming a stronger notion of concealment-for each classical communication history, not in average-allows Alice's cheat to pass also the worst-case Bob's test. The present approach allows us to restate the concealment-bindingness tradeoff in terms of the continuity of dilations of probabilistic quantum combs with the metric given by the comb discriminability-distance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1087
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impossibility of Quantum Bit Commitment, a Categorical Perspective
    Sun, Xin
    He, Feifei
    Wang, Quanlong
    AXIOMS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [2] Why there is no impossibility theorem on secure quantum bit commitment
    Yuen, HP
    QUANTUM COMMUNICATION, MEASUREMENT AND COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 371 - 376
  • [3] Possibility, impossibility, and cheat sensitivity of quantum-bit string commitment
    Buhrman, Harry
    Christandl, Matthias
    Hayden, Patrick
    Lo, Hoi-Kwong
    Wehner, Stephanie
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2008, 78 (02):
  • [4] An Information-Theoretic Perspective on the Quantum Bit Commitment Impossibility Theorem
    Nagy, Marius
    Nagy, Naya
    ENTROPY, 2018, 20 (03)
  • [5] Simple proof of the impossibility of bit commitment in generalized probabilistic theories using cone programming
    Sikora, Jamie
    Selby, John
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2018, 97 (04)
  • [6] Quantum Bit Commitment with Application in Quantum Zero-Knowledge Proof
    Yan, Jun
    Weng, Jian
    Lin, Dongdai
    Quan, Yujuan
    ALGORITHMS AND COMPUTATION, ISAAC 2015, 2015, 9472 : 555 - 565
  • [7] On the impossibility of non-static quantum bit commitment between two parties
    Li, Qin
    Li, Chengqing
    Long, Dongyang
    Chan, W. H.
    Wu, Chunhui
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2012, 11 (02) : 519 - 527
  • [8] On the impossibility of non-static quantum bit commitment between two parties
    Qin Li
    Chengqing Li
    Dongyang Long
    W. H. Chan
    Chunhui Wu
    Quantum Information Processing, 2012, 11 : 519 - 527
  • [9] Impossibility of unconditionally secure commitment of a certified classical bit
    Kent, A
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2000, 61 (04): : 4 - 423014
  • [10] Impossibility of Growing Quantum Bit Commitments
    Winkler, Severin
    Tomamichel, Marco
    Hengl, Stefan
    Renner, Renato
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 107 (09)