Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:137
|
作者
Rex, DK
Imperiale, TF
Portish, V
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Margaret Mary Community Hosp, Batesville, IN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70381-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sedation causes most of the complications of colonoscopy. Sedation is used selectively in some countries but is routine in the United States. Methods: Cross-sectional survey and randomized controlled trial were used to identify patient factors associated with willingness to try colonoscopy without sedation and to compare pain and satisfaction scores and willingness to return to the same physician in patients randomized to receive routine sedation versus as needed sedation. A single colonsocopist invited 250 consecutive eligible outpatients to be randomized to routine sedation versus as needed sedation. Seventeen who preferred no sedation and 163 who preferred sedation refused. Seventy accepted and were randomized. Results: Male gender (odds ratio 4.33; 95% CI [2.27, 8.26]), increasing age (odds ratio for 10-year increase 1.28; 95% CI [1.01, 1.06]), and absence of abdominal pain (odds ratio 5.13; 95% CI [1.68, 15.63]) were associated with willingness to be randomized. Total colonoscopy was achieved without sedation in 94% of those who received sedation only as needed. Pain scores were higher in the sedation as needed arm. All 35 patients in the routine sedation arm were "very satisfied". In the sedation as needed arm, 31 of the 34 were "very satisfied" and 3 were "somewhat satisfied". All randomized patients said they would return to the same colonoscopist. Patients in the sedation as needed arm had less decline in blood pressure, less hypoxemia, and lower charges than those in the routine sedation arm. Conclusions: Experienced colonoscopists should consider offering colonoscopy without sedation to selected patients.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:554 / 559
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Shah, SG
    Brooker, JC
    Thapar, C
    Suzuki, N
    Williams, CB
    Saunders, BP
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (07) : 832 - 837
  • [42] Do patients (and doctors) tolerate EUS without sedation? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Fockens, P
    Bergman, JJ
    Kok, MF
    Bonta, PI
    Lemkes, JS
    Vandenbrink, G
    Tytgat, GN
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB109 - AB109
  • [43] The effect of bispectral index monitoring on cognitive performance following sedation for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Sargin, Mehmet
    Uluer, Mehmet Selcuk
    Simsek, Baris
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 137 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Lizhu Xiao
    Zhenghua Zhang
    Jing Lu
    Zhaoguo Liu
    Jiaoling Zhang
    Lu Kang
    Jiefu Tang
    Xiaohua Zou
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24 (1)
  • [45] Peppermint Oil to Improve Visualization in Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Shah, Ishani
    Baffy, Noemi J.
    Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L.
    Langlais, Blake T.
    Ruff, Kevin C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (03) : 141 - 147
  • [46] Remifentanil-ketamine vs. propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial
    Karacaer, Feride
    Biricik, Ebru
    Ilginel, Murat
    Kucukbingoz, Cagatay
    Agin, Mehmet
    Tumgor, Gokhan
    Gunes, Yasemin
    Ozcengiz, Dilek
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (06): : 597 - 604
  • [47] Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for Sedation in Colonoscopy Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aminnejad, Reza
    Hormati, Ahmad
    Shafiee, Hamed
    Alemi, Faezeh
    Hormati, Maryam
    Saeidi, Mohammad
    Ahmadpour, Sajjad
    Sabouri, Seyed Mahdi
    Aghaali, Mohammad
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 21 (08) : 724 - 731
  • [48] A randomized trial comparing patient-controlled sedation using propofol/alfentanil to diazemul/pethidine in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.
    Liu, GM
    Ching, JY
    Chan, SK
    Lau, JY
    Sun, LC
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB62 - AB62
  • [49] Effect of Midazolam in Addition to Propofol and Opiate Sedation on the Quality of Recovery After Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Gurunathan, Usha
    Rahman, Tony
    Williams, Zelda
    Vandeleur, Ann
    Sriram, Sweta
    Harch, Jennifer
    Boggett, Stuart
    Hill, Cindy
    Bowyer, Andrea
    Royse, Colin
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 131 (03): : 741 - 750
  • [50] Safety and efficacy of target-controlled infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Cuiabano, Igor Seror
    Garbin, Priscila de Miranda
    Modolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro
    do Nascimento Junior, Paulo
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (06): : 751 - 757