Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use

被引:164
|
作者
Macharis, Cathy [1 ]
Turcksin, Laurence [1 ]
Lebeau, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, MOBI, MOSI T, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Transport project appraisal; Multi actor multi criteria analysis; Stakeholders; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; AHP; TRANSPORT; ALTERNATIVES; METHODOLOGY; STRATEGIES; PROMETHEE; SELECTION; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this contribution, the multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) to evaluate transport projects is presented. This evaluation methodology specifically focuses on the inclusion of the different actors that are involved in a project, the so-called stakeholders. Like the traditional multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA), it allows including qualitative as well as quantitative criteria with their relative importance, but within the MAMCA they represent the goals and objectives of the multiple stakeholders. As such, the stakeholders are incorporated in the decision process. The theoretical foundation of the MAMCA method is shown, together with several applications in the field of transport appraisal. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 620
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing Spatial Data Infrastructure Policy Strategies Using the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Geudens, Tessa
    Macharis, Cathy
    Crompvoets, Joep
    Plastria, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURES RESEARCH, 2009, 4 : 265 - 297
  • [42] The use of multi-criteria analysis for selection of technology for a household WWTP compatible with sustainable development
    Jozwiakowski, Krzysztof
    Mucha, Zbigniew
    Generowicz, Agnieszka
    Baran, Stanislaw
    Bielinska, Jolanta
    Wojcik, Wlodzimierz
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 41 (03) : 76 - 82
  • [43] Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Smart and Sustainable Machining Process
    Celent, Luka
    Mladineo, Marko
    Gjeldum, Nikola
    Zizic, Marina Crnjac
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [44] THE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE RESULTS OBTAINED WITH THE METHODS OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISIONS
    Peldschus, Friedel
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2009, 15 (04) : 580 - 592
  • [45] Bases of Elements of Multi-Criteria Analysis of Quality of Design Decisions
    Kazaryan, Ruben
    5TH WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS), 2020, 960
  • [46] Decision-making on Olympic urban development - A multi-actor decision support tool
    Heurkens, E. W. T. M.
    Innovations in Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, 2006, : 251 - 262
  • [47] Use of a Multi-Criteria Decision Support Tool to Prioritize Reconstruction Projects in a Post-Disaster Phase
    Goujon, Benedicte
    Labreuche, Christophe
    2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT (ICT-DM), 2015, : 200 - 206
  • [48] Exploring Refinability of Multi-Criteria Decisions
    Brugha, Cathal M.
    CUTTING-EDGE RESEARCH TOPICS ON MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 35 : 304 - 310
  • [49] A bilateral deliberation mechanism for conflict resolving with multi-actor and multi-criteria
    Luo, Shucheng
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zhu, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 319 (01) : 234 - 245
  • [50] New methods of multi-criteria decisions
    Hradilek, Zdenek
    Junca, Leos
    Krejci, Petr
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2005, 2005, : 177 - 185