Modelling and optimization of a GMA welding process by genetic algorithm and response surface methodology

被引:89
|
作者
Kim, D
Rhee, S [1 ]
Park, H
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul 133791, South Korea
[2] Res Inst Ind Sci & Technol, Welding & Struct Integr Res Team, Pohang, South Korea
[3] Kia Motors Corp, Mfg Engn R&D Team, Kwangmyung Shi, Kyungki Do, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00207540110119964
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The welding process, due to its complexity, has relied on empirical and experimental data to determine its welding conditions. However, trial-and-error methods to determine optimal conditions incur considerable time and cost. In order to overcome these problems, a genetic algorithm and response surface methodology have been suggested for determining optimal welding conditions. First, in a relatively broad region, near-optimal conditions were determined through a genetic algorithm. Then, the optimal conditions for welding were determined over a relatively small region around these near-optimal conditions by using response surface methodology. In order to give different objective function values according to the positive or negative response from the set target value in the optimization problem, a desirability function approach was used. Application of the method proposed in this paper revealed a good result for finding the optimal welding conditions in the gas metal arc (GMA) welding process.
引用
收藏
页码:1699 / 1711
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between genetic algorithms and response surface methodology in GMAW welding optimization
    Correia, DS
    Gonçalves, CV
    da Cunha, SS
    Ferraresi, VA
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 160 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [22] Optimization of laser spiral welding using Response surface methodology and genetic algorithms
    Zhou, Bin
    Chen, Jieshi
    Zhang, Yang
    Yang, Shanglei
    Lu, Hao
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (02) : 2381 - 2392
  • [23] Parametric Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding Process Parameters by Response Surface Methodology
    Sharma, Pankaj
    Mohal, Sachin
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 24 : 673 - 682
  • [24] OPTIMIZATION OF NAPTHALENE BIODEGRADATION BY A GENETIC ALGORITHM BASED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Zafar, M.
    Kumar, Shashi
    Kumar, Surendra
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 27 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [25] Comparison between Response Surface Methodology, Genetic Algorithm & Glowworm Swarm Optimization in Injection Moulding Process
    Humaizi, T. M.
    Fathullah, M.
    Shayfull, Z.
    Nasir, S. M.
    Shazzuan, M.
    GREEN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE: ADVANCED AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS, 2018, 2030
  • [26] Optimization of Bead Geometry Using Imperialist Competitive Algorithm in GMA Welding Process
    Wu, Q. Q.
    Lee, J. P.
    Park, M. H.
    Kim, I. S.
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND MEASURING TECHNOLOGY V, 2015, : 1178 - 1184
  • [27] Reactive Black Removal by using Electrocoagulation Techniques: An Response Surface Methodology Optimization and Genetic Algorithm Modelling Approach
    Manikandan, S.
    Saraswathi, R.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 14 (02) : 174 - 183
  • [28] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    Ajith, P. M.
    Husain, T. M. Afsal
    Sathiya, P.
    Aravindan, S.
    JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 22 (10) : 954 - 960
  • [29] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    P.M.AJITH
    T.M.AFSAL HUSAIN
    P.SATHIYA
    S.ARAVINDAN
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research(International), 2015, 22 (10) : 954 - 960
  • [30] Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm
    P. M. Ajith
    T. M. Afsal Husain
    P. Sathiya
    S. Aravindan
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2015, 22 : 954 - 960