Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US

被引:27
|
作者
Amin, Alpesh [1 ]
Bruno, Amanda [2 ]
Trocio, Jeffrey [3 ]
Lin, Jay [4 ]
Lingohr-Smith, Melissa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Plainsboro, NJ USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[4] Novosys Hlth, Green Brook, NJ USA
关键词
Economic model; Healthcare costs; New oral anticoagulants; Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; Venous thromboembolism;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: Medical costs that may be avoided when any of the four new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are used instead of warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were estimated and compared. Additionally, the overall differences in medical costs were estimated for NVAF and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patient populations combined. Methods: Medical cost differences associated with NOAC use vs warfarin or placebo among NVAF and VTE patients were estimated based on clinical event rates obtained from the published trial data. The clinical event rates were calculated as the percentage of patients with each of the clinical events during the trial periods. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted for the medical-cost differences determined for NVAF patients. A hypothetical health plan population of 1 million members was used to estimate and compare the combined medical-cost differences of the NVAF and VTE populations and were projected in the years 2015-2018. Results: In a year, the medical-cost differences associated with NOAC use instead of warfarin were estimated at -$204, -$140, -$495, and -$340 per patient for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, among the hypothetical population, the medical-cost differences were -$3.7, -$4.2, -$11.5, and -$6.6 million for NVAF and acute VTE patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, for the combined NVAF, acute VTE, and extended VTE patient populations, medical-cost differences were -$10.0, -$10.9, -$21.0, and -$21.0 million for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg apixaban, and 5mg apixaban, respectively. Medical-cost differences associated with use of NOACs were projected to steadily increase from 2014 to 2018. Conclusions: Medical costs are reduced when NOACs are used instead of warfarin/placebo for the treatment of NVAF or VTE, with apixaban being associated with the greatest reduction in medical costs.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 409
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Under-prescription of direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in the COVID-19 lockdown period
    Onder, Graziano
    Olimpieri, Pier Paolo
    Celant, Simone
    Di Lenarda, Andrea
    Ambrosio, Giuseppe
    Reboldi, Gianpaolo
    Gensini, Gianfranco
    Colatrella, Antonietta
    Palmer, Katie
    Gabrielli, Domenico
    Russo, Pierluigi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : E149 - E152
  • [42] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY FOR NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS: WARFARIN VERSUS THE NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS RIVAROXABAN, DABIGATRAN AND APIXABAN
    Ortiz-Cartagena, Ismael
    Gotay, Antonio Orraca
    Acevedo, Jose
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 490 - 490
  • [43] Retrospective cohort study to compare the efficacy and safety of the new direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for elective cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Hassan, Elwaleed
    Witherow, Fraser
    Quick, Juliet
    Edwards, Tim
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2017, 19 (0G) : G6 - G6
  • [44] Persistence and outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Wu, Shanshan
    Xie, Shuo
    Xu, Yingjie
    Que, Dongdong
    Yau, Tung On
    Wang, Lizi
    Huang, Yuanping
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (9-10) : 1839 - 1846
  • [45] DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANT EDOXABAN IN PATIENTS WITH NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: RESULTS OF DIRECT COMPARISON WITH WARFARIN
    Yavelov, I. S.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2020, 60 (08) : 124 - 129
  • [46] Era of new anticoagulants in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: prospects and challenges
    Safiullina, Z. M.
    Shalaev, S. V.
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [47] Non-valvular atrial fibrillation: potential clinical implications of the heterogeneous definitions used in trials on new oral anticoagulants
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Cimaglia, Paolo
    Fantecchi, Elisa
    Mantovani, Valentina
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Valzania, Cinzia
    Martignani, Cristian
    Biffi, Mauro
    Diemberger, Igor
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (07) : 491 - 496
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of non-Vitamin-K oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Harenberg, J.
    Krejczy, M.
    Wehling, M.
    Obermann, K.
    Lip, G. Y. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 1107 - 1107
  • [49] Healthcare Resource Utilization for Oral Anticoagulant Reversal Therapies in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation/Venous Thromboembolism Patients
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    Hartaigh, Briain O.
    Cao, Zhun
    Lipkin, Craig
    Robinson, Scott B.
    Caberwal, Harjeet
    Petrini, Michaela
    Wang, Cheng
    CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01) : 27 - 43
  • [50] New oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: harder to handle than expected
    Shurlock, Barry
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (28) : 1825 - 1826