Community structure of in-stream bryophytes in English and Welsh rivers

被引:44
|
作者
Scarlett, P [1 ]
O'Hare, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Winfrith Technol Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Dorchester DT2 8ZD, Dorset, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
bryophytes; geology; upland; lowland;
D O I
10.1007/s10750-005-1078-4
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Information on the distribution of bryophytes in mainland British rivers was collected as part of the Joint Nature Conservancy Council (JNCC) survey of in-stream macrophyte distribution between 1978 and 1997. A sub-set of sites (1604) containing the 50 most common bryophytes was analysed. The commonest of these 50 species were Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides. The majority of species encountered are not considered to be truly aquatic. Detrended Correspondence Analysis of community structure revealed a continuum of variation in assemblages across sites rather than distinct groupings of bryophytes. Canonical Correspondence Analysis was used to analyse a sub-set of sites (625) for which water chemistry were available to test the influence of environmental variables on the distribution of bryophytes. The analysis suggested the strongest environmental gradient was the transition from lowland systems on chalk geology to steeply sloping, high altitude systems with resistant geology. Mapping CCA axis 1 scores on to a map of England and Wales suggested a geographic trend in bryophyte species distribution with community structure undergoing a transition from the upland regions and the western seaboard to the south east of England. Stepwise regression analysis confirmed the importance of the upland-lowland trend, showing that substrate size, altitude of source, distance to source and altitude were important predictors of species richness (p < 0.0001, adjusted R-2 = 0.30).
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Community Structure of In-Stream Bryophytes in English and Welsh Rivers
    Peter Scarlett
    Matthew O’Hare
    Hydrobiologia, 2006, 553 : 143 - 152
  • [2] A method of estimating in-stream residence time of water in rivers
    Worrall, F.
    Howden, N. J. K.
    Burt, T. P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 512 : 274 - 284
  • [3] Riparian and in-stream restoration of boreal streams and rivers: success or failure?
    Nilsson, Christer
    Polvi, Lina E.
    Gardestrom, Johanna
    Hasselquist, Eliza Maher
    Lind, Lovisa
    Sarneel, Judith M.
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (05) : 753 - 764
  • [4] Productive grazing, healthy rivers: Improving riparian and in-stream biodiversity
    Jones, M
    Aarons, S
    WOOL TECHNOLOGY AND SHEEP BREEDING, 2002, 50 (04): : 737 - 742
  • [5] Quantification of Transverse In-Stream Structure Hydraulics
    Scurlock, S. Michael
    Thornton, Christopher I.
    Baird, Drew C.
    Abt, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (02)
  • [6] The Effects of Channelization with Low In-Stream Barriers on Macroinvertebrate Communities of Mountain Rivers
    Szarek-Gwiazda, Ewa
    Ciszewski, Dariusz
    Kownacki, Andrzej
    WATER, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [7] Occurrence and in-stream attenuation of wastewater-derived pharmaceuticals in Iberian rivers
    Acuna, Vicenc
    von Schiller, Daniel
    Jesus Garcia-Galan, Maria
    Rodriguez-Mozaz, Sara
    Corominas, Lluis
    Petrovic, Mira
    Poch, Manel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Sabater, Sergi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 503 : 133 - 141
  • [8] Sustaining the In-stream Flow of Rivers: Comparative Case Study of Germany and Bangladesh
    Abu Shoaib, Syed
    Baur, Rolf
    Sultana, Nahid
    Haque, M.
    Hossain, Md
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2011, 8 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [9] The incidence of escaped Irish farmed salmon in English and Welsh rivers
    Milner, NJ
    Evans, R
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 403 - 406
  • [10] Numerical simulation of large dunes in meandering streams and rivers with in-stream rock structures
    Khosronejad, Ali
    Kozarek, Jessica L.
    Palmsten, Margaret L.
    Sotiropoulos, Fotis
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 81 : 45 - 61