Measures To Improve Crop Classification Using Remotely Sensed Hyperion Hyperspectral

被引:0
|
作者
Chauhan, Hasmukh J. [1 ]
Mohan, B. Krishna [2 ]
机构
[1] BVM Engn Coll, Vallabh Vidyanagar 388120, Gujarat, India
[2] CSRE, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
EO1-Earth Observing 1; FLAASH- Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercube; ENVI- ENvironment for Visualizing Images; SAM- Spectral Angle Mapper;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hyperion- a hyperspectral sensor is carried on NASA's EO1 satellite. This study was carried out for Lonar area of Jalna district, Maharashtra using data of January 2008. Hyperion data contains 242 spectral bands ranging from 356 to 2577 nm out of which 196 calibrated bands (bands: 8-57 and 79-224) are used for further processing. Level 1 product (.L1R) for which only radiometric correction was applied is used for this study. To get the complete advantage of hyperspectral data atmospheric correction is essential. FLAASH, a very effective code for hyperspectral data available in ENVI is applied for atmospheric correction. The atmospherically corrected image contains 168 bands after removing absorption bands. As a first measure principal component and band correlation analysis based spectral subset is applied for optimum band selection for vegetation application. Field study was conducted in January 2009 to collect field spectra. Spectral library was built for major three crops of the study area i.e. chana, jawar and wheat by spectra collected from the field. As a second measure before classification NDVI value based mask is applied to differentiate agricultural areas from other vegetated areas and non vegetated area. After discarding other areas, crop classification is carried out only in the agricultural area. Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) a very popular algorithm for hyperspectral image classification is applied for image classification and accuracy assessment is carried out.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 599
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Classification of remotely sensed images using artificial neural networks
    Mohan, BK
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2000, 46 (05) : 401 - 410
  • [32] A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF LAND CLASSIFICATION USING REMOTELY SENSED DATA
    Kulkarni, Keerti
    Vijaya, P. A.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES AND COMMUNICATION (ICCMC), 2017, : 36 - 41
  • [33] Textural classification of remotely sensed images using multiresolution techniques
    Ansari, Rizwan Ahmed
    Buddhiraju, Krishna Mohan
    Bhattacharya, Avik
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 35 (14) : 1580 - 1602
  • [34] Using maps to automate the classification of remotely-sensed imagery
    Carlotto, MJ
    ALGORITHMS FOR MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY II, 1996, 2758 : 40 - 50
  • [36] Using support vectors machine for classification of remotely sensed images
    Bundzel, M
    Sincák, P
    Kopco, N
    STATE OF THE ART IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, : 361 - 369
  • [37] SPARSE GRAPH REGULARIZATION FOR ROBUST CROP MAPPING USING HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY: A CASE STUDY IN HEIHE, ZHANGYE OASIS
    Xue, Zhaohui
    Su, Hongjun
    Du, Peijun
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 779 - 782
  • [38] Land Classification Using Remotely Sensed Data: Going Multilabel
    Karalas, Konstantinos
    Tsagkatakis, Grigorios
    Zervakis, Michael
    Tsakalides, Panagiotis
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (06): : 3548 - 3563
  • [39] Narrowband vegetation index performance using the AVIRIS hyperspectral remotely sensed data
    Zhang, Lifu
    Yan, Lei
    Yang, Shaowen
    GEOINFORMATICS 2006: REMOTELY SENSED DATA AND INFORMATION, 2006, 6419
  • [40] Texture classification in remotely sensed images
    Yang, SS
    Hung, CC
    IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2002: PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 62 - 66