S-cerevisiae has three pathways for DNA interstrand crosslink repair

被引:88
|
作者
Grossmann, KF [1 ]
Ward, AM [1 ]
Matkovic, ME [1 ]
Folias, AE [1 ]
Moses, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Mol & Med Genet, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR | 2001年 / 487卷 / 3-4期
关键词
DNA repair; cisplatin; psoralen; DNA interstrand crosslinks; angelicin;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8777(01)00106-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Yeast mutants, snm1 (pso2-1), rev3 (pso1-1), and rad51, which display significant sensitivity to interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) have low relative sensitivity to other DNA damaging agents. SNM1, REV3, and RAD51 were disrupted in the same haploid strain, singly and in combination. The double mutants, snm1 Delta rev3 Delta, snm1 Delta rad51 Delta and rev3 Delta rad51 Delta were all more sensitive to ICLs than any of the single mutants, indicating that they are in separate epistasis groups for survival. A triple mutant displayed greater sensitivity to ICLs than any of the double mutants, with one ICL per genome being lethal. Therefore, Saccharomyces cerevisiae appears to have three separate ICL repair pathways, but no more. S-phase delay was not observed after ICL damage introduced by cisplatin (CDDP) or 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) during the G1-phase, in any of the above mutants, or in an isogenic rad14 Delta mutant deficient in nucleotide excision repair. However. the psoralen analog angelicin (monoadduct damage) induced a significant S-phase delay in the rad14 Delta mutant. Thus, normal S-phase in the presence of ICLs does not seem to be due to rapid excision repair. The results also indicate that monoadduct formation by CDDP or 8-MOP at the doses used is not sufficient to delay S-phase in the rad14 Delta mutant. While the sensitivity of a rev3 Delta mutant indicates Pol zeta is needed for optimal ICL repair, isogenic cells deficient in Pol eta (rad30 Delta cells) were not significantly more sensitive to ICL agents than wild-type cells, and have no S-phase delay. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 83
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REV1 and DNA polymerase zeta in DNA interstrand crosslink repair
    Sharma, Shilpy
    Canman, Christine E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 53 (09) : 725 - 740
  • [22] The role of ADP-ribosylation in regulating DNA interstrand crosslink repair
    Gunn, Alasdair R.
    Banos-Pinero, Benito
    Paschke, Peggy
    Sanchez-Pulido, Luis
    Ariza, Antonio
    Day, Joseph
    Emrich, Mehera
    Leys, David
    Ponting, Chris P.
    Ahel, Ivan
    Lakin, Nicholas D.
    JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2016, 129 (20) : 3845 - 3858
  • [23] The β-lactamase motif in Snm1 is required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by interstrand crosslinks in S-cerevisiae
    Li, XR
    Moses, RE
    DNA REPAIR, 2003, 2 (01) : 121 - 129
  • [24] Deciphering the interstrand crosslink DNA repair network expressed by Trypanosoma brucei
    Dattani, Ambika
    Wilkinson, Shane R.
    DNA REPAIR, 2019, 78 : 154 - 166
  • [25] The role of USP1 autocleavage in DNA interstrand crosslink repair
    Kim, Mira
    Kim, Jung Min
    FEBS LETTERS, 2016, 590 (03) : 340 - 348
  • [26] Fanconi Anemia: From DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair to Novel Therapies
    Surralles, Jordi
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2022, 63 : 27 - 27
  • [27] The role of exonucleases in replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair
    McHugh, Peter
    MUTAGENESIS, 2014, 29 (06) : 532 - 532
  • [28] Repair of UV induced DNA-damage in centromeres of S-cerevisiae
    Capiaghi, C
    Thoma, F
    YEAST, 2003, 20 : S91 - S91
  • [29] Genomic approaches for identifying DNA damage response pathways in S-cerevisiae
    Chang, Michael
    Parsons, Ainslie B.
    Sheikh, Bilal H.
    Boone, Charles
    Brown, Grant W.
    DNA REPAIR, PT B, 2006, 409 : 213 - 235
  • [30] NEIL3: A unique DNA glycosylase involved in interstrand DNA crosslink repair
    Oswalt, Leah E.
    Eichman, Brandt F.
    DNA REPAIR, 2024, 139