The relationship between five-factor model and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-fifth edition personality traits on patients with antisocial personality disorder

被引:0
|
作者
Amini, Mahdi [1 ]
Pourshahbaz, Abbas [2 ]
Mohammadkhani, Parvaneh [2 ]
Ardakani, Mohammad-Reza Khodaie [3 ]
Lotfi, Mozhgan [4 ]
Ramezani, Mohammad Arash [5 ]
机构
[1] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Behav Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil, Dept Clin Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil, Dept Psychiat, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Behav Sci & Mental Hlth, Tehran Inst Psychiat, Mental Hlth Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Family Res Inst, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Antisocial personality disorder; diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-fifth division; five-factor model; personality traits; STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PSYCHOPATHY; CLASSIFICATION; DIMENSIONS; RELEVANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the fact that new criteria of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-fifth edition (DSM-5) were resulted from five-factor model (FFM), there is a small amount of studies that investigate the relations between proposed personality traits and FFM. Also, cross-cultural study in this field continuously would be needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between the FFM and DSM-5 ASPD pathological traits. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study design. The participants consisted of 122 individuals with ASPD that selected from prisoners (73.0%), outpatients (18.0%), and inpatients (9.0%). They were recruited from Tehran Prisoners, and Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry Clinics of Razi and Taleghani Hospitals, Tehran, Iran, since 2013-2014. The Sample was selected based on judgmental sampling. The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders-Personality Questionnaire, NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised, and DSM-5 personality trait rating form were used to diagnosis and assessment of personality disorder. Pearson correlation has been used for data analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 16 software. Results: The results indicate that neuroticism (N) has positive significant relationship with hostility (r = 0.33, P < 0.01), manipulativeness (r = 0.25, P < 0.01), deceitfulness (r =. 23, P < 0.01), impulsivity (r = 0.20, P < 0.05), and negative relation with risk taking (r = -0.23, P < 0.01). Also, there was significant relationship between extraversion (E) with manipulativeness (r = 0.28, P < 0.01) and deceitfulness (r = 0.32, P < 0.01). Agreeableness and conscientiousness have negative significant relation with DSM-5 traits. In addition, results showed that there is positive significant relationship between FFM and DSM-5 personality traits with DSM-fourth edition-text revision (DSM-IV-TR) ASPD symptoms (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Except manipulativeness, deceitfulness, and callousness, there is positively significant relationship between DSM-5 ASPD traits and DSM-IV-TR ASPD symptoms. The present study helps to understand the adequacy of dimensional approach to evaluation of ASPD pathology, specifically on Iranian sample.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 476
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Personality disorder symptoms in adolescence: A five-factor model perspective
    De Clercq, B
    De Fruyt, F
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2003, 17 (04) : 269 - 292
  • [32] Peace and Personality: The Relationship Between the Five-Factor Model's Personality Traits and the Peace Attitude Scale
    Cavarra, Mauro
    Canegallo, Virginia
    Santoddi, Erika
    Broccoli, Erika
    Fabio, Rosa Angela
    PEACE AND CONFLICT-JOURNAL OF PEACE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 27 (03) : 508 - 511
  • [33] The Five-Factor Model of Personality Disorder and DSM-5
    Trull, Timothy J.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 80 (06) : 1697 - 1720
  • [34] Latent structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition personality disorder criteria
    Nestadt, G
    Hsu, FC
    Samuels, J
    Bienvenu, OJ
    Reti, I
    Costa, PT
    Eaton, WW
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [35] The quality of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition dependent personality disorder prototype
    Gude, Tore
    Karterud, Sigmund
    Pedersen, Geir
    Falkum, Erik
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (06) : 456 - 462
  • [36] Predicting Personality Disorder Functioning Styles by the Five-Factor Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire in Healthy Volunteers and Personality Disorder Patients
    Gao, Qianqian
    Ma, Guorong
    Zhu, Qisha
    Fan, Hongying
    Wang, Wei
    PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 49 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [37] Bipolar disorder, unipolar depression and the Five-Factor Model of Personality
    Bagby, RM
    Young, LT
    Schuller, DR
    Bindseil, KD
    Cooke, RG
    Dickens, SE
    Levitt, AJ
    Joffe, RT
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1996, 41 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [38] Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory
    Oltmanns, Joshua R.
    DeShong, Hilary L.
    Sanders, Catherine A.
    Kurtz, John E.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 38 (04) : 590 - 599
  • [39] Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory
    Joshua R. Oltmanns
    Hilary L. DeShong
    Catherine A. Sanders
    John E. Kurtz
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2016, 38 : 590 - 599
  • [40] Evolution of personality disorder diagnosis in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    Coolidge, FL
    Segal, DL
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 18 (05) : 585 - 599