Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial

被引:19
|
作者
Zaki, Mary N. [1 ]
Wing, Deborah A. [1 ]
McNulty, Jennifer A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[2] Miller Childrens & Womens Hosp, Long Beach, CA USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; class III obesity; severely obese; skin closure; smoking; staples; surgical site infections; sutures; tobacco; wound infection; wound separation; SKIN CLOSURE; WOUND COMPLICATIONS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; DELIVERY; RISK; INFECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare stainless steel staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure for cesarean delivery in class III obese women with body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 teaching hospitals from 2015 through 2016 in which women with body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2) undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and infection occurring up to 6 weeks following delivery. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and patient pain and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: A total of 242 women were enrolled. In all, 119 in the staples group and 119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (P = .74) with an overall wound complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the frequencies of infection, or in superficial or deep wound separation between the 2 study groups. In a univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a significant predictor of wound complications (relative risk, 4.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.03; P = .02). Fewer women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (P = .01), however, self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those who had subcuticular suture skin closure.
引用
收藏
页码:451.e1 / 451.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal dosing of cefazolin in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Maggio, Lindsay
    Nicolau, David
    DaCosta, Melissa
    Lopes, Vrishali
    Rouse, Dwight
    Anderson, Brenna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S28 - S28
  • [32] Adhesive Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures for Cesarean Section Skin Closure: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rahman, Hafizur
    Khalda, Ezzat
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 5 (04): : 332 - 340
  • [33] Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing
    Ibrahim, Moustafa I.
    Moustafa, Gamal Farag
    Abd Al-Hamid, Ahmed Sherif
    Hussein, May Raafat
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (05) : 981 - 986
  • [34] Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing
    Moustafa I. Ibrahim
    Gamal Farag Moustafa
    Ahmed Sherif Abd Al-Hamid
    May Raafat Hussein
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 289 : 981 - 986
  • [35] Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Sharma, Shikha
    Soni, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [36] Pfannenstiel vs. vertical skin incision for cesarean delivery in women with class III obesity: a randomized clinical trial
    Marrs, Caroline
    Blackwell, Sean
    Hester, Ashley
    Olson, Gayle
    Saade, George
    Faro, Jon
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Sibai, Bahaeddine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S29 - S29
  • [37] Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Imamura, Kazuhiro
    Adachi, Kensuke
    Sasaki, Ritsuko
    Monma, Satoko
    Shioiri, Sadaaki
    Seyama, Yasuji
    Miura, Masaru
    Morikawa, Yoshihiko
    Kaneko, Tetsuji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (12) : 2083 - 2092
  • [38] Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kazuhiro Imamura
    Kensuke Adachi
    Ritsuko Sasaki
    Satoko Monma
    Sadaaki Shioiri
    Yasuji Seyama
    Masaru Miura
    Yoshihiko Morikawa
    Tetsuji Kaneko
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 2083 - 2092
  • [39] Subcuticular interrupted versus continuous skin suturing in elective cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial (Expression of Concern of Vol 32, Pg 4114, 2019)
    不详
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (01):
  • [40] Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared between staples and subcuticular suture technique for wound closure after primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Nepal, Sarthak
    Ruangsomboon, Pakpoom
    Udomkiat, Pacharapol
    Unnanuntana, Aasis
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (09) : 1255 - 1263