HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing Using Sanger and Next-Generation Sequencing in Adults with Low-Level Viremia in China

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Qun [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Fengting [1 ,2 ]
Song, Chuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Hongxin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Lao, Xiaojie [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yunxia [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Fujie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Clin Ctr HIV AIDS, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Emerging Infect Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Clin & Res Ctr Infect Dis, Beijing 100015, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
HIV-1; low-level viremia; drug-resistance mutation; next-generation sequencing; DRUG-RESISTANCE; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; INFECTED PATIENTS; TRANSIENT VIREMIA; MUTATIONS; OUTCOMES; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.2147/IDR.S387215
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in HIV-1 patients with low-level viremia (LLV) and explored the performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting HIV DRMs by using LLV samples.Methods: Overall, 80 samples with LLV were amplified and sequenced using a commercial Sanger sequencing (SS) genotyping kit. Furthermore, 51 samples successfully sequenced using SS were simultaneously subjected to NGS. Genotyping success rates of various viremia categories by two sequencing methods were calculated. Stanford HIV-1 drug-resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the DRMs. In the NGS assay, a threshold of 5% was considered for reporting low-frequency variants, and the DRMs detected using SS and NGS were compared.Results: The overall success rate of PR/RT regions was 88.1% (67/80) using SS and 86.3% (44/51) using NGS. Furthermore, a significant linear trend was noted between viral load and the genotyping success rate. A total of 38.8% (26/67) participants harbored at least one mutation, as revealed through SS. Moreover, the prevalence of DRMs in persistent LLV was significantly higher than that in intermittent LLV (62.1% vs. 21.1%; P < 0.05). A total of 69 DRMs were detected using the two sequencing methods at the threshold of 5%. Moreover, 10 DRMs missed by SS were detected using NGS, whereas 8 DRMs missed by NGS were detected by SS.Conclusion: Our data suggested that the genotyping resistance testing is necessary to guide antiretroviral therapy optimization in LLV patients.
引用
收藏
页码:6711 / 6722
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HIV-1 drug resistance mutations detection and HIV-1 subtype G report by using next-generation sequencing platform
    Gholami, Mohammad
    Rouzbahani, NeginHosseini
    Samiee, SiamakMirab
    Tayeri, Katayoun
    Ghorban, Khodayar
    Dehkharghani, Alireza Dolatyar
    Gholami, Ali Akbar
    Moshiri, Farzaneh
    Sattari, Arash
    Dadmanesh, Maryam
    Mohraz, Minoo
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2020, 146
  • [22] Minimizing Next-Generation Sequencing Errors for HIV Drug Resistance Testing
    Fernandez-Caballero, Jose A.
    Chueca, Natalia
    Poveda, Eva
    Garcia, Federico
    AIDS REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) : 231 - 238
  • [23] Genotypic resistance in HIV-1 - Infected patients with persistently detectable low-level viremia while receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy
    Nettles, RE
    Kieffer, TL
    Simmons, RP
    Cofrancesco, J
    Moore, RD
    Gallant, JE
    Persaud, D
    Siliciano, RF
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (07) : 1030 - 1037
  • [24] A Concentration Method for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in Low-Level Viremia Samples
    Li, Qun
    Yu, Fengting
    Song, Chuan
    Zhao, Hongxin
    Yan, Liting
    Xiao, Qing
    Lao, Xiaojie
    Yang, Siyuan
    Tang, Yunxia
    Xiao, Jiang
    Zhang, Fujie
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [25] Added Value of Next Generation over Sanger Sequencing in Kenyan Youth with Extensive HIV-1 Drug Resistance
    Novitsky, V
    Nyandiko, W.
    Vreeman, R.
    DeLong, A. K.
    Manne, A.
    Scanlon, M.
    Ngeresa, A.
    Aluoch, J.
    Sang, F.
    Ashimosi, C.
    Jepkemboi, E.
    Orido, M.
    Hogan, J. W.
    Kantor, R.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (06):
  • [26] Sanger and Next Generation Sequencing Approaches to Evaluate HIV-1 Virus in Blood Compartments
    Arias, Andrea
    Lopez, Pablo
    Sanchez, Raphael
    Yamamura, Yasuhiro
    Rivera-Amill, Vanessa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (08)
  • [27] Applying Next-Generation Sequencing to Track HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations Circulating in Portugal
    Pimentel, Victor
    Pingarilho, Marta
    Sebastiao, Cruz S.
    Miranda, Mafalda
    Goncalves, Fatima
    Cabanas, Joaquim
    Costa, Ines
    Diogo, Isabel
    Fernandes, Sandra
    Costa, Olga
    Corte-Real, Rita
    Martins, M. Rosario O.
    Seabra, Sofia G.
    Abecasis, Ana B.
    Gomes, Perpetua
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2024, 16 (04):
  • [28] Portable Nanopore sequencing solution for next-generation HIV drug resistance testing
    Park, Sung Yong
    Faraci, Gina
    Ganesh, Kevin
    Dube, Michael P.
    Lee, Ha Youn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 171
  • [29] Characteristics of drug resistance mutations in ART-experienced HIV-1 patients with low-level viremia in Zhengzhou City, China
    Liu, Jinjin
    Li, Chaofeng
    Sun, Yan
    Fu, Chaohong
    Wei, Shuguang
    Zhang, Xiaohua
    Ma, Jie
    Zhao, Qingxia
    Huo, Yuqi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [30] Universal Amplification, Next-Generation Sequencing, and Assembly of HIV-1 Genomes
    Gall, Astrid
    Ferns, Bridget
    Morris, Clare
    Watson, Simon
    Cotten, Matthew
    Robinson, Mark
    Berry, Neil
    Pillay, Deenan
    Kellam, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (12) : 3838 - 3844