HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing Using Sanger and Next-Generation Sequencing in Adults with Low-Level Viremia in China

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Qun [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Fengting [1 ,2 ]
Song, Chuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Hongxin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Lao, Xiaojie [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yunxia [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Fujie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Clin Ctr HIV AIDS, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Emerging Infect Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Clin & Res Ctr Infect Dis, Beijing 100015, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
HIV-1; low-level viremia; drug-resistance mutation; next-generation sequencing; DRUG-RESISTANCE; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; INFECTED PATIENTS; TRANSIENT VIREMIA; MUTATIONS; OUTCOMES; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.2147/IDR.S387215
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in HIV-1 patients with low-level viremia (LLV) and explored the performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting HIV DRMs by using LLV samples.Methods: Overall, 80 samples with LLV were amplified and sequenced using a commercial Sanger sequencing (SS) genotyping kit. Furthermore, 51 samples successfully sequenced using SS were simultaneously subjected to NGS. Genotyping success rates of various viremia categories by two sequencing methods were calculated. Stanford HIV-1 drug-resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the DRMs. In the NGS assay, a threshold of 5% was considered for reporting low-frequency variants, and the DRMs detected using SS and NGS were compared.Results: The overall success rate of PR/RT regions was 88.1% (67/80) using SS and 86.3% (44/51) using NGS. Furthermore, a significant linear trend was noted between viral load and the genotyping success rate. A total of 38.8% (26/67) participants harbored at least one mutation, as revealed through SS. Moreover, the prevalence of DRMs in persistent LLV was significantly higher than that in intermittent LLV (62.1% vs. 21.1%; P < 0.05). A total of 69 DRMs were detected using the two sequencing methods at the threshold of 5%. Moreover, 10 DRMs missed by SS were detected using NGS, whereas 8 DRMs missed by NGS were detected by SS.Conclusion: Our data suggested that the genotyping resistance testing is necessary to guide antiretroviral therapy optimization in LLV patients.
引用
收藏
页码:6711 / 6722
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of an In Vitro Diagnostic Next-Generation Sequencing Assay with Sanger Sequencing for HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing
    Tzou, Philip L.
    Ariyaratne, Pramila
    Varghese, Vici
    Lee, Charlie
    Rakhmanaliev, Elian
    Villy, Carolin
    Yee, Meiqi
    Tan, Kevin
    Michel, Gerd
    Pinsky, Benjamin A.
    Shafer, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (06)
  • [2] HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing using the Vela automated next-generation sequencing platform
    Raymond, Stephanie
    Nicot, Florence
    Carcenac, Romain
    Lefebvre, Caroline
    Jeanne, Nicolas
    Saune, Karine
    Delobel, Pierre
    Izopet, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 73 (05) : 1152 - 1157
  • [3] Efficacy of genotypic drug resistance testing in patients with low-level plasma HIV-1 viremia
    Parczewski, Milosz
    Leszczyszyn-Pynka, Magdalena
    Witak-Jedra, Magdalena
    Maciejewska, Katarzyna
    Urbanska, Anna
    HIV & AIDS REVIEW, 2015, 14 (03): : 80 - 83
  • [4] Genotypic resistance in HIV-1 infected patients with persistent low-level viremia
    Parra-Ruiz, Jorge
    Alvarez, Marta
    Chueca, Natalia
    Pena, Alejandro
    Pasquau, Juan
    Angel Lopez-Ruz, Miguel
    del Carmen Maroto, Maria
    Hernandez-Quero, Jose
    Garcia, Federico
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2009, 27 (02): : 75 - 80
  • [5] Prospective Evaluation of the Vela Diagnostics Next-Generation Sequencing Platform for HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing
    Weber, Jenna
    Volkova, Ilona
    Sahoo, Malaya K.
    Tzou, Philip L.
    Shafer, Robert W.
    Pinsky, Benjamin A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 21 (06): : 961 - 970
  • [6] RNA and DNA Sanger sequencing versus next-generation sequencing for HIV-1 drug resistance testing in treatment-naive patients
    Alidjinou, E. K.
    Deldalle, J.
    Hallaert, C.
    Robineau, O.
    Ajana, F.
    Choisy, P.
    Hober, D.
    Bocket, L.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (10) : 2823 - 2830
  • [7] Frequency matters: comparison of drug resistance mutation detection by Sanger and next-generation sequencing in HIV-1
    Balakrishna, Suraj
    Loosli, Tom
    Zaheri, Maryam
    Frischknecht, Paul
    Huber, Michael
    Kusejko, Katharina
    Yerly, Sabine
    Leuzinger, Karoline
    Perreau, Matthieu
    Ramette, Alban
    Wymant, Chris
    Fraser, Christophe
    Kellam, Paul
    Gall, Astrid
    Hirsch, Hans H.
    Stoeckle, Marcel
    Rauch, Andri
    Cavassini, Matthias
    Bernasconi, Enos
    Notter, Julia
    Calmy, Alexandra
    Gunthard, Huldrych F.
    Metzner, Karin J.
    Kouyos, Roger D.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 78 (03) : 656 - 664
  • [8] Towards Next-Generation Sequencing for HIV-1 Drug Resistance Testing in a Clinical Setting
    Teo, Calesta Hui Yi
    Norhisham, Nurul Hannah Binte
    Lee, Ogestelli Fabia
    Png, Siyu
    Chai, Chean Nee
    Yan, Gabriel
    Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
    Lee, Chun Kiat
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (10):
  • [9] Next-generation sequencing for cytomegalovirus genotypic antiviral resistance testing
    Mostafa, Heba H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (12)
  • [10] Genotypic Tropism Testing in HIV-1 Proviral DNA Can Provide Useful Information at Low-Level Viremia
    Fabeni, Lavinia
    Berno, Giulia
    Svicher, Valentina
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, Francesca
    Gori, Caterina
    Bertoli, Ada
    Mussini, Cristina
    Lichtner, Miriam
    Zaccarelli, Mauro
    Ammassari, Adriana
    Pinnetti, Carmela
    Cicalini, Stefania
    Mastroianni, Claudio Maria
    Andreoni, Massimo
    Antinori, Andrea
    Perno, Carlo Federico
    Santoro, Maria Mercedes
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (09) : 2935 - 2941