Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes

被引:89
|
作者
Kagawa, T
Irikura, K
Somerville, PG
机构
[1] Geores Inst, Nishi Ku, Osaka 5500012, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto, Japan
[3] URS Corp, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2004年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
strong ground motion; surface rupture fault; buried rupture fault; rupture process; asperity; stress drop; slip velocity;
D O I
10.1186/BF03352486
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We have studied differences in ground motion and fault rupture characteristics between surface rupture and buried rupture earthquakes. We found that the ground motion generated by buried rupture in the period range around I second is on average 1.5 times larger than the average empirical relationship. In contrast, ground motion from earthquakes that rupture the surface is,1.5 times smaller in the same period range. This phenomenon is considered to be caused by differences in fault rupture process between the two types of earthquakes. To examine possible reasons of the above effect we analyzed source slip distribution data derived from waveform inversions, and divided them into two groups: surface rupture and buried rupture earthquakes. It was found that the large slip areas (asperities) of surface rupture earthquakes are concentrated in the depth range shallower than about 5 km. In contrast, large slip areas of buried rupture earthquakes are spread over the depth deeper than 5 km. We also found that the total rupture area of buried rupture earthquakes is 1.5 times smaller than that of surface rupture earthquakes having the same seismic moment, and that deep asperities have about 3 times larger effective stress drops and 2 times higher slip velocities than shallow asperities. These observations are verified by numerical simulations using stochastic Green's function method.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fault rupture directivity of large earthquakes in Himalaya
    H. N. Srivastava
    Mithila Verma
    B. K. Bansal
    Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2018, 91 : 9 - 14
  • [22] The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: Nonplanar fault structure, dynamic rupture process, and strong ground motion
    Aochi, H
    Madariaga, R
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (03) : 1249 - 1266
  • [23] Variability in surface rupture between successive earthquakes on the Suusamyr Fault, Kyrgyz Tien Shan: implications for palaeoseismology
    Ainscoe, E. A.
    Abdrakhmatov, K. E.
    Baikulov, S.
    Carr, A. S.
    Elliott, A. J.
    Gruetzner, C.
    Walker, R. T.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 216 (01) : 703 - 725
  • [24] Width of surface rupture zone for thrust earthquakes: implications for earthquake fault zoning
    Boncio, Paolo
    Liberi, Francesca
    Caldarella, Martina
    Nurminen, Fiia-Charlotta
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 18 (01) : 241 - 256
  • [25] SOURCE SPECTRA OF GREAT EARTHQUAKES - TELESEISMIC CONSTRAINTS ON RUPTURE PROCESS AND STRONG MOTION
    HOUSTON, H
    KANAMORI, H
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1986, 76 (01) : 19 - 42
  • [26] Analysis of the surface rupture process of strong earthquakes based on centrifuge tests
    Shen, Chao
    Bo, Jingshan
    Qi, Wenhao
    Zhang, Xuedong
    Huang, Jingyi
    Qiao, Feng
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 136
  • [27] Evidence of surface rupture associated with historical earthquakes on the Gulbahce Fault Zone (Izmir, Turkiye) and its application for determination of the surface fault-rupture hazard zone
    Geckin, Berna Sengocmen
    Sozbilir, Hasan
    Ozkaymak, Caglar
    Softa, Mustafa
    Spencer, Joel Q. G.
    Sahiner, Eren
    Meric, Niyazi
    Deliormanli, Ahmet Hamdi
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 114 (02) : 2189 - 2218
  • [28] Fault structure control on fault slip and ground motion during the 1999 rupture of the Chelungpu fault, Taiwan
    Heermance, R
    Shipton, ZK
    Evans, JP
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (03) : 1034 - 1050
  • [29] Modeling the rupture dynamics of strong ground motion (> 1 g) in fault stepovers
    Lozos, Julian
    Akciz, Sinan
    Ladage, Holland
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2025, 895
  • [30] An approach to evaluate ground surface rupture caused by reverse fault movement
    Zhao J.
    Tao X.
    Shi L.
    Wang H.
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 5 (1) : 29 - 39