Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes

被引:86
|
作者
Kagawa, T
Irikura, K
Somerville, PG
机构
[1] Geores Inst, Nishi Ku, Osaka 5500012, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto, Japan
[3] URS Corp, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2004年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
strong ground motion; surface rupture fault; buried rupture fault; rupture process; asperity; stress drop; slip velocity;
D O I
10.1186/BF03352486
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We have studied differences in ground motion and fault rupture characteristics between surface rupture and buried rupture earthquakes. We found that the ground motion generated by buried rupture in the period range around I second is on average 1.5 times larger than the average empirical relationship. In contrast, ground motion from earthquakes that rupture the surface is,1.5 times smaller in the same period range. This phenomenon is considered to be caused by differences in fault rupture process between the two types of earthquakes. To examine possible reasons of the above effect we analyzed source slip distribution data derived from waveform inversions, and divided them into two groups: surface rupture and buried rupture earthquakes. It was found that the large slip areas (asperities) of surface rupture earthquakes are concentrated in the depth range shallower than about 5 km. In contrast, large slip areas of buried rupture earthquakes are spread over the depth deeper than 5 km. We also found that the total rupture area of buried rupture earthquakes is 1.5 times smaller than that of surface rupture earthquakes having the same seismic moment, and that deep asperities have about 3 times larger effective stress drops and 2 times higher slip velocities than shallow asperities. These observations are verified by numerical simulations using stochastic Green's function method.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes
    Takao Kagawa
    Kojiro Irikura
    Paul G. Somerville
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2004, 56 : 3 - 14
  • [2] 3D simulation of near-fault strong ground motion: comparison between surface rupture fault and buried fault
    刘启方
    袁一凡
    金星
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, (04) : 337 - 344
  • [3] 3D simulation of near-fault strong ground motion: Comparison between surface rupture fault and buried fault
    Liu Qifang
    Yuan Yifan
    Jin Xing
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2007, 6 (04) : 337 - 344
  • [4] 3D simulation of near-fault strong ground motion: comparison between surface rupture fault and buried fault
    Qifang Liu
    Yifan Yuan
    Xing Jin
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 6 : 337 - 344
  • [5] Validation of Deterministic Broadband Ground Motion and Variability from Dynamic Rupture Simulations of Buried Thrust Earthquakes
    Withers, Kyle B.
    Olsen, Kim B.
    Shi, Zheqiang
    Day, Steven M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (01) : 212 - 228
  • [6] Influence factors on the ground surface rupture zone induced by buried normal fault dislocation
    Jianfeng Qi
    Fengjunnan Liu
    Xiangyu Yang
    Yang Zhao
    Earthquake Science, 2020, 33 (02) : 62 - 71
  • [7] Influence factors on the ground surface rupture zone induced by buried normal fault dislocation
    Qi, Jianfeng
    Liu, Fengjunnan
    Yang, Xiangyu
    Zhao, Yang
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2020, 33 (02) : 62 - 71
  • [8] A POSSIBLE RUPTURE PROCESS OF SLOW EARTHQUAKES ON A FRICTIONAL FAULT
    MIKUMO, T
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 65 (01): : 129 - 153
  • [9] Do buried-rupture earthquakes trigger less landslides than surface-rupture earthquakes for reverse faults?
    Xu, Chong
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 216 : 53 - 57
  • [10] Numerical Study of Ground-Motion Differences between Buried-Rupturing and Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes
    Pitarka, Arben
    Dalguer, Luis A.
    Day, Steven M.
    Somerville, Paul G.
    Dan, Kazuo
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 99 (03) : 1521 - 1537