Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets-a comparative study

被引:10
|
作者
Reicheneder, C. A. [1 ]
Gedrange, T. [2 ]
Berrisch, S.
Proff, P. [1 ]
Baumert, U. [1 ]
Faltermeier, A. [1 ]
Muessig, D.
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Orthodont, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Med Ctr, Dept Orthodont Prevent & Pediat Dent, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjn053
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the frictional properties of four self-ligating metal brackets, Speed, Damon 2, In-Ovation, and Time, with those of three conventionally ligated metal brackets, Time, Victory Twin, and Discovery. The self-ligating Time bracket can also be used as a conventionally ligated bracket. Friction was tested 20 times for each bracket/wire combination using a Zwick testing machine with stainless steel wires in three different wire dimensions (0.017 x 0.025, 0.018 x 0.025, and 0.019 x 0.025 inches). All brackets had a 0.022 inch slot and the prescription of an upper first premolar. The data were statistically analysed with unsigned comparisons of all bracket/wire combinations using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Games-Howell post hoc test. The results showed almost all brackets to have the lowest frictional force with a wire dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inch. Friction of the self-ligating brackets using wire with a dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inches was 45-48 per cent lower than with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. Friction of the conventionally ligated brackets showed a 14 per cent or less reduced friction with 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire compared with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. The self-ligating metal brackets showed lower frictional forces with a 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire than conventionally ligated brackets, whereas conventionally ligated brackets showed lower friction with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wire. Friction values vary with different bracket/archwire combinations and, therefore, the choice of a bracket system for treatment should consider the correct wire dimension to produce the lowest possible frictional forces.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 660
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of passive play and torque expression in self-ligating and traditional lingual brackets
    Albertini, Paolo
    Mazzanti, Valentina
    Mollica, Francesco
    Lombardo, Luca
    Siciliani, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2022, 83 (01): : 13 - 22
  • [42] Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets
    Hamilton, Robert
    Goonewardene, Mithran S.
    Murray, Kevin
    AUSTRALIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2008, 24 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [43] Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets
    Burrow, S. Jack
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2010, 80 (04) : 626 - 633
  • [44] An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets
    Montasser, M. A.
    Keilig, L.
    Bourauel, C.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [45] Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions
    Kaygisiz, Emine
    Uzuner, Fatma Deniz
    Yuksel, Sema
    Taner, Levent
    Culhaoglu, Rana
    Sezgin, Yasemin
    Ates, Can
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (03) : 468 - 473
  • [46] SELF-LIGATING ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS ASSOCIATED WITH FEWER PLAQUE BACTERIA
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (07): : 836 - +
  • [47] Three-dimensional deformation comparison of self-ligating brackets
    Melenka, Garrett W.
    Nobes, David S.
    Carey, Jason P.
    Major, Paul W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 143 (05) : 645 - 657
  • [48] Retrospective investigation of the effects and efficiency of self-ligating and conventional brackets
    Anand, Megha
    Turpin, David L.
    Jumani, Ketan S.
    Spiekerman, Charles F.
    Huang, Greg J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [49] Dynamic behavior and surface characteristics of conventional and self-ligating brackets
    Vale, Francisco
    Malo, Luisa
    Caramelo, Francisco
    Ramos, Joao
    Cavaleiro, Joao
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2016, 57 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [50] Evidence-based comparison of self-ligating and conventional brackets
    Souper, German Hempel
    Sat Yaber, Maria Ignacia
    Aguilar, Valeria Vargas
    Munoz, Alejandro Diaz
    ODONTOESTOMATOLOGIA, 2021, 23 (38):