Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets-a comparative study

被引:10
|
作者
Reicheneder, C. A. [1 ]
Gedrange, T. [2 ]
Berrisch, S.
Proff, P. [1 ]
Baumert, U. [1 ]
Faltermeier, A. [1 ]
Muessig, D.
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Orthodont, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Med Ctr, Dept Orthodont Prevent & Pediat Dent, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjn053
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the frictional properties of four self-ligating metal brackets, Speed, Damon 2, In-Ovation, and Time, with those of three conventionally ligated metal brackets, Time, Victory Twin, and Discovery. The self-ligating Time bracket can also be used as a conventionally ligated bracket. Friction was tested 20 times for each bracket/wire combination using a Zwick testing machine with stainless steel wires in three different wire dimensions (0.017 x 0.025, 0.018 x 0.025, and 0.019 x 0.025 inches). All brackets had a 0.022 inch slot and the prescription of an upper first premolar. The data were statistically analysed with unsigned comparisons of all bracket/wire combinations using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Games-Howell post hoc test. The results showed almost all brackets to have the lowest frictional force with a wire dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inch. Friction of the self-ligating brackets using wire with a dimension of 0.018 x 0.025 inches was 45-48 per cent lower than with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. Friction of the conventionally ligated brackets showed a 14 per cent or less reduced friction with 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire compared with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wires. The self-ligating metal brackets showed lower frictional forces with a 0.018 x 0.025 inch wire than conventionally ligated brackets, whereas conventionally ligated brackets showed lower friction with 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch wire. Friction values vary with different bracket/archwire combinations and, therefore, the choice of a bracket system for treatment should consider the correct wire dimension to produce the lowest possible frictional forces.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 660
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frictional Resistance in Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets and Conventionally Ligated Brackets
    Ehsani, Sayeh
    Mandich, Marie-Alice
    El-Bialy, Tarek H.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (03) : 592 - 601
  • [2] Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment
    Ong, Emily
    McCallum, Hugh
    Griffin, Mark P.
    Ho, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (02) : 138.e1 - 138.e7
  • [4] Self-ligating brackets versus conventional brackets
    Sesso, G.
    Monti, B.
    Salvadori, S.
    Poletti, L.
    Maspero, C.
    Farronato, G.
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2014, 82 (05) : 311 - 318
  • [5] Self-ligating brackets
    Agarwal, Sachin
    Valiathan, Ashima
    Shah, Neelesh V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [6] Self-ligating brackets
    Razavi, Mohammad R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [7] Self-ligating Brackets
    Hofmann, T.
    Zachrisson, B.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2010, 42 (03): : 213 - 215
  • [8] Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket
    Brickley, Mark
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 39 (01) : 6 - 7
  • [9] Systematic review of self-ligating brackets
    Kaklamanos, Eleftherios G.
    Athanasiou, Athanasios E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (02) : 145 - 146
  • [10] Systematic review of self-ligating brackets
    Chen, Stephanie Shih-Hsuan
    Greenlee, Geoffrey Michael
    Kim, Jihyun-Elizabeth
    Smith, Craig L.
    Huang, Greg J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (06) : 726 - 727