Reading Level and Length of Written Research Consent Forms

被引:23
|
作者
Larson, Elaine [1 ]
Foe, Gabriella [2 ]
Lally, Rachel [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Nursing, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Sch Continuing Studies, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Human Res Protect Off, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
risk management; psychosocial; prevention; patients; evidence-based medicine; ethics;
D O I
10.1111/cts.12253
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In 100 Institutional Review Board approved consent forms (CFs), we assessed pages, reading levels, and whether they included essential elements. CF page numbers ranged from 3 to 28 (mean, 10.3) and readability ranged from grades 5.6 to 28.9 (mean, 11.6). The CF mean score for including essential elements was 90.8% (range: 63.5-100%). There were no significant differences by specialty in number of pages (p = 0.053), but surgical specialties had the highest readability (mean, 13.1), and pediatrics the lowest (10.5), p = 0.008. While approved CFs generally included the Office for Human Research Protections recommended essential elements, they were very long, and even pediatric forms, which had the lowest reading levels, were written on average at a tenth grade level. Researchers need guidance to resolve pressure between regulatory mandates and guidelines and keeping it simple and clear.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:355 / 356
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readability of informed consent forms in biomedical research
    Paris, A.
    Cracowski, J. L.
    Ravanel, N.
    Cornu, C.
    Gueffier, F.
    Deygas, B.
    Guillot, K.
    Bosson, J. L.
    Hommel, M.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 18 : 114 - 114
  • [22] UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH CONSENT FORMS - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    PROCHAZKA, AV
    LOVERDE, ME
    BYYNY, RL
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A782 - A782
  • [23] Redesigning Consent Forms and Processes for Health Research
    Wright, David
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IPCC), 2012,
  • [24] Readability of consent forms in veterinary clinical research
    Sobolewski, Josey
    Bryan, Jeffrey N.
    Duval, Dawn
    O'Kell, Allison
    Tate, Deborah J.
    Webb, Tracy
    Moore, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (02) : 350 - 355
  • [25] Anaesthetists need consent, but not written consent
    Aitkenhead, A
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7217): : 1135 - 1135
  • [26] Analysis of the written patient information forms to obtain informed consent in clinical trials
    Baines, JPO
    Briz, EL
    Sanz, EU
    Sánchez, RT
    Torres, NVJ
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1999, 112 (03): : 90 - 94
  • [27] Quality of written informed consent forms for electroconvulsive therapy in Australia: a comparative analysis
    Jagadheesan, Karuppiah
    Walker, Frances
    Lakra, Vinay
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 30 (02) : 190 - 194
  • [28] QUALITY AND LEGIBILITY OF WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT FORM IN PHARMACOGENETIC RESEARCH
    Ruiz Ramos, Jesus
    Cueto-Sola, Margarita
    Garcia Robles, Ana
    Perez Huertas, Pablo
    Tordera Baviera, Maria
    Poveda Andres, Jose Luis
    CUADERNOS DE BIOETICA, 2015, 26 (86): : 129 - 138
  • [29] Evaluation of length and complexity of written consent forms in English and Hebrew for participation in clinical trials authorized in one medical institution in Israel: A descriptive study
    Ashkenazi, Itamar
    Oster, Natan
    Feinberg, Philip
    Olsha, Oded
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2020, 27 (03): : 138 - 145
  • [30] Some Researchers Wear Yellow Pants, but Even Fewer Participants Read Consent Forms: Exploring and Improving Consent Form Reading in Human Subjects Research
    Douglas, Benjamin D.
    McGorray, Emma L.
    Ewell, Patrick J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 26 (01) : 61 - 68