Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems

被引:60
|
作者
Zemring, FE [1 ]
Johnson, DT
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Criminal Justice Res Program, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
punishment; democracy; public attitudes; leniency; severity; salience; discretion; trust in government;
D O I
10.1177/0002716205285949
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
It is unlikely that hostile attitudes about criminals or beliefs that punishments for crime were too lenient were the major causes of the explosive increase in punishments in the United States after 1970. public hostility toward criminals has been a consistent theine in this country for a long time, but it did not cause big increases in imprisonment before 1970 in the United States or large expansions of incarceration elsewhere. In this article, the authors argue that growth in the salience of crime as a citizen concern and increasing public distrust of government competence and legitimacy were two of a number of changes that transformed ever-present hostile attitudes into a dynamic force in American politics. Negative attitudes toward offenders are a necessary condition for anticrime crusades, but they are always present. It was the addition of fear and distrust into. the law and politics of punishment setting that produced the perfect storm of punitive expansion.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 280
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条