Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal size in dogs with acute allograft rejection

被引:17
|
作者
Nyland, TG
Fisher, PE
Gregory, CR
Wisner, ER
机构
[1] Dept. of Surg. and Radiological Sci., School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis
关键词
dogs; kidneys; transplantation; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1740-8261.1997.tb01604.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the best method to ultrasonographically monitor renal size changes associated with acute allograft rejection in dogs. Qualitative changes in renal cortical and medullary echogenicity were also evaluated, although this was not a major focus of the study. Four unrelated, mixed-breed dogs underwent bilateral nephrectomies and heterotopic renal allograft transplantation. Ultrasound examinations of transplanted kidneys were initiated at 3 days after surgery and continued at 2-3 day intervals until death (38 +/- 2 days). Ultrasound measurements of kidney length, width, height, cross-sectional area, and estimated volume were used to assess relative changes in renal size associated with transplantation and rejection. Transplanted kidneys had a rapid increase in volume and cross-sectional area that averaged 103% and 83% above baseline levels, respectively, by 17 days after transplantation. The increased size was attributed to a combination of hypertrophy and acute rejection, the latter of which was confirmed at postmortem. Kidney volume decreased to approximately 35% above baseline volume by day 34 as rejection became more advanced. Qualitative changes associated with rejection included medullary enlargement with decreased echogenicity early in the study, followed by increased cortical thickness and echogenicity with poor cortical medullary definition in the latter stages of the survival period. It was concluded that relative changes in renal allograft size can be easily monitored with ultrasound. In regard to linear measurements, changes in renal width were more pronounced than changes in height or length with acute rejection. Therefore measurements that incorporate the width, namely volume or cross-sectional area, appear to be the most sensitive for monitoring changes in allograft size. Renal cross-sectional area measurements are preferred because they are simple to perform using the automated calculation capability of most newer ultrasound units.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 61
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival
    Cosio, FG
    Pelletier, RP
    Falkenhain, ME
    Henry, ML
    Elkhammas, EA
    Davies, EA
    Bumgardner, GL
    Ferguson, RM
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (11) : 1611 - 1615
  • [22] The role of chemokines in acute renal allograft rejection and chronic allograft injury
    Fischereder, Michael
    Schroppel, Bernd
    FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2009, 14 : 1807 - 1814
  • [23] Adhesion molecule Polymorphisms in acute renal allograft rejection
    Khazen, D.
    Jendoubi-Ayed, S.
    Gorgi, Y.
    Sfar, I.
    Abderrahim, E.
    Ben Abdallah, T.
    Ayed, K.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (08) : 2563 - 2564
  • [24] Urinary biomarkers for acute renal allograft rejection.
    Powell, RB
    Varghese, SA
    Taylor, TP
    Annand, A
    Almeida, J
    Emovon, OE
    Arthur, JM
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S298 - S299
  • [25] Determinants of hypofiltration during acute renal allograft rejection
    Jani, A
    Polhemus, C
    Corrigan, G
    Kwon, O
    Myers, BD
    Pavlakis, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (03):
  • [26] Analysis of serum proteome of acute renal allograft rejection
    Chen, Jianghua
    Mao, Youying
    Shou, Zhangfei
    He, Qiang
    Yang, Hao
    Yu, Jiekai
    Zheng, Shu
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 : 261 - 261
  • [27] Association of acute glomerulitis and renal allograft rejection.
    Cordeiro, NF
    Eustace, J
    Charney, D
    Zachary, A
    Racusen, LC
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S227 - S227
  • [28] TREATMENT OF ACUTE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT REJECTION - REVIEW
    SY, GS
    TOLEDOPEREYRA, LH
    DIALYSIS & TRANSPLANTATION, 1979, 8 (08) : 767 - 771
  • [29] THE ROLE OF EOSINOPHILS IN ACUTE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT REJECTION
    WANG, HW
    NANRA, RS
    STEIN, A
    AVIS, L
    PRICE, A
    HIBBERD, AD
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 46 (03) : 933 - 933
  • [30] RENAL TARGET STRUCTURES IN ACUTE ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION
    LESZCZYNSKI, D
    LASZCZYNSKA, M
    HALTTUNEN, J
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1987, 19 (01) : 378 - 378