A firm level analysis of asymmetric response ofUSstock returns to exchange rate movements

被引:8
|
作者
Salisu, Afees A. [1 ]
Isah, Kazeem [1 ,2 ]
Ogbonnaya-Orji, Nnenna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ibadan, Ctr Econometr & Allied Res, Ibadan, Nigeria
[2] Kogi State Univ, Dept Econ, Anyigba, Nigeria
[3] Cent Bank Nigeria, Res Dept, Abuja, Nigeria
关键词
asymmetry; exchange rate; firm-level analysis; nonlinear panel ARDL; stock returns; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; STOCK RETURNS; FOREIGN-EXCHANGE; OIL PRICE; CROSS-SECTION; PANEL-DATA; RATE RISK; MARKETS; NEXUS; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2210
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The extant studies on stock returns-exchange rate nexus have been suspected of aggregation bias, we therefore resolve to revisit the nexus using firm-level data while also accounting for asymmetry. We utilize stock price data covering 326 firms listed in S&P500 index and organized into 11 sectors. We examine the probable asymmetric response of these firms to exchange rate movements using the nonlinear panel ARDL method which simultaneously accounts for any inherent asymmetry and heterogeneity effects and suitable for large N and Large T panels. We establish that asymmetry exists in the stock returns-exchange rate nexus predominantly in the short run. We further show that exchange rate appreciation (depreciation) produces primarily positive (negative) effects on stock returns. We also find that the positive impacts overwhelm the negative impacts in magnitude and statistical significance. Thus, returns on investment in U.S. stocks differ significantly between currency appreciation and depreciation and by implication investors seeking to maximize returns need to exercise some level caution when confronted with sharp swings in exchange rate particularly during turbulent periods. While the results are robust to data frequency and to an extent, the choice of foreign currency, they are sensitive to different market conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1239
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraday and interday distribution of stock returns and their asymmetric conditional volatility: Firm-level evidence
    Balaban, Ercan
    Ozgen, Tolga
    Karidis, Socrates
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 503 : 905 - 915
  • [22] Distributional characteristics of interday stock returns and their asymmetric conditional volatility: Firm-level evidence
    Balaban, Ercan
    Ozgen, Tolga
    Girgin, Mehmet Sencer
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 508 : 280 - 288
  • [23] Exchange Rate and Stock Prices in Nigeria: Firm-Level Evidence
    Adeniyi, Oluwatosin
    Kumeka, Terver
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN BUSINESS, 2020, 21 (02) : 235 - 263
  • [24] Firm-Level Heterogeneity and the Aggregate Exchange Rate Effect on Exports
    Dekle, Robert
    Jeong, Hyeok
    Ryoo, Heajin H.
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2016, 92 (298) : 435 - 447
  • [25] Asymmetric volatility transmission between the real exchange rate and stock returns in South Africa
    Sikhosana, Ayanda
    Aye, Goodness C.
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2018, 60 : 1 - 8
  • [26] Asymmetric exchange rate exposure of stock returns: empirical evidence from Chinese industries
    Cuestas, Juan Carlos
    Tang, Bo
    [J]. STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 21 (04):
  • [27] Detecting hidden patterns of exchange rate returns with recurrence analysis
    Kodera, Jan
    Quang Van Tran
    [J]. 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2019, 2019, : 55 - 60
  • [28] An empirical analysis of real exchange rate movements in the euro
    Hamori, Shigeyuki
    Hamori, Naoko
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (10) : 1187 - 1191
  • [29] EXCHANGE-RATE MOVEMENTS AND THE STOCK RETURNS OF UNITED-STATES COMMERCIAL-BANKS
    HARRIS, JM
    MARR, MW
    SPIVEY, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1991, 22 (03) : 233 - 242
  • [30] Do economic factors influence stock returns? A firm and industry level analysis
    Butt, Babar Zaheer
    Rehman, Kashif Ur
    Khan, M. Aslam
    Safwan, Nadeem
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 4 (05): : 583 - 593