Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Dixon, Lauren Kari [1 ]
Akberali, Umme [2 ]
Di Tommaso, Ettorino [2 ]
George, Sarah J. [2 ]
Johnson, Thomas W. [2 ,3 ]
Bruno, Vito Domenico [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Publ Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Translat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Heart Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Coronary disease; Coronary bypass; Minimal invasive; Hybrid; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Heart team; EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS; FOLLOW-UP; SURGERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines the benefits of a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery anastomosis, via a mini thoracotomy, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for other diseased coronaries. Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of HCR with those of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MCAD). Methods: We performed a meta-analysis with a primary outcome of short-term mortality and secondary outcomes of mid-term survival, length of hospital stay, stroke, renal failure and mid-term MACE rate. Results: 3399 patients (HCR = 1164, CABG = 2235) were included, with no significant difference in short-term mortality between groups (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = [0.90,2.49], p = 0.11), although a higher mortality rate was seen in the HCR group (0.73% vs 0.64%). The average length of stay in intensive care unit was significantly shorter following HCR than CABG (mean difference = -15.52 h, CI = [-22.47,-8.59], p<0.001) and overall hospital stay was also shorter in this group, although not statistically significant (mean difference = -3.15 days, 95% CI = [-6.55, 0.25], p = 0.07). HCR was associated with a reduced odds of blood transfusion (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = [0.22,0.54], p < 0.001). There was not a significant difference in mid-term survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = [0.62,1.21], p = 0.39) or MACE rate (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.55,1.23], p = 0.34). No differences were found between HCR and CABG for post-operative stroke (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = [0.87, 2.13], p = 0.16) or renal failure (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.43,1.16], p = 0.14). Conclusions: HCR has a higher incidence of short-term mortality compared to CABG in patients with MCAD, although this difference is not statistically significant. Similar rates of mid-term survival and other short term post-operative complications were found between the two groups. HCR has a shorter ICU stays and reduced requirement for blood transfusion.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 27
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hybrid coronary revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Hu, Shengshou
    Gao, Runlin
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2014, 25 (03) : 258 - 265
  • [32] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Demonstrates Lower Mortality Rates Compared to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elfaituri, Muhammed K.
    Khaled, Ala
    Benghatnsh, Ahmed Tarek Saeed
    Msherghi, Ahmed
    Elfaituri, Ahmed
    Omran, Elham
    Faraj, Hazem Abdelkarem
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [33] Multivessel disease: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting
    Munir, Muhammad S.
    Delaughter, Craig
    Ahmed, Amany H.
    Lee, Vei-Vei
    Elayda, MacArthur A.
    Wilson, James M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 40B - 40B
  • [34] Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Khan, Abdur R.
    Golwala, Harsh
    Tripathi, Avnish
    Riaz, Hans
    Kumar, Arnav
    Flaherty, Michael P.
    Bhaft, Deepak L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (12): : 1949 - 1956
  • [35] Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Giambruno, Vincenzo
    Jones, Philip
    Khaliel, Feras
    Chu, Michael W.
    Teefy, Patrick
    Sridhar, Kumar
    Cucchietti, Cristina
    Barnfield, Rebecca
    Kiaii, Bob
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (05): : 1330 - 1335
  • [36] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat surgical revascularization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dimagli, Arnaldo
    Cancelli, Gianmarco
    Soletti, Giovanni, Jr.
    Olaria, Roberto Perezgrovas
    Chadow, David
    Rahouma, Mohamed
    Girardi, Leonard
    Gaudino, Mario
    JTCVS OPEN, 2022, 12 : 177 - 191
  • [37] Generalized hybrid coronary revascularization vs. conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zhang, Shuai
    Li, Ping
    Li, Guang
    Yan, Yunfeng
    Sun, Tao
    Lin, Ji
    Zhang, Chenhao
    Liu, Shuo
    Qu, Zheng
    You, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [38] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease: The Korean Multicenter Revascularization registry (KORR)
    Gwon, HC
    Choi, SH
    Choi, BIW
    Cho, SY
    Ro, YM
    Lee, WR
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 20 (02) : 196 - 203
  • [39] Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Traditional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Disease
    Hebbo, Elsa
    Barker, Madeleine
    Gold, Daniel
    Hassan, Malika Elhage
    Sawan, Mariem
    Halkos, Michael
    Jaber, Wissam
    Sandesara, Pratik
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [40] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING IN LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Hennessy, C.
    Henry, J. A.
    Brameier, D. T.
    Kharbanda, R. K.
    Myerson, S. G.
    HEART, 2021, 107 : A56 - A56