Do Stakeholders Modulate Philanthropic Strategy? Corporate Philanthropy as Stakeholders' Engagement

被引:7
|
作者
Arco-Castro, Maria Lourdes [1 ]
Lopez-Perez, Maria Victoria [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, Sara [1 ]
Garde-Sanchez, Raquel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Accounting & Finance, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
corporate philanthropy; signaling theory; foundations; donations; stakeholders; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; CONSUMER; FOUNDATIONS; PERFORMANCE; REPUTATION; DONATIONS; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACT; CSR; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.3390/su12187242
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Corporate philanthropy, as an expression of commitment to the common good, can contribute to the creation of social value in companies. This corporate philanthropy can be managed in various ways. The choice of how to channel corporate philanthropy could be, in accordance with stakeholder theory, the result of companies' interactions with key stakeholders and, in accordance with the theory of signaling, a signal that companies use to respond to their demands. This approach contributes to the literature on bottom-up initiatives (stakeholder-managers) as opposed to top-down strategies (board-stakeholders) in relation to corporate social responsibility, which is becoming increasingly important in a society where networks of communication, cooperation and interaction are established. To this end, a study was conducted on 221 European companies indexed in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices in the year 2018. The findings have several practical implications: The management of corporate philanthropy should take into account the stakeholders' requirements, and stakeholders show greater affinity and trust with the company when philanthropy is channeled through foundations. By contrast, donations are not associated with stakeholder attitudes. As a theoretical implication, this paper supports the theories of stakeholders and signaling by explaining the role of philanthropy in the relationship with stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Antecedents of Corporate Scandals: CEOs' Personal Traits, Stakeholders' Cohesion, Managerial Fraud, and Imbalanced Corporate Strategy
    Zona, Fabio
    Minoja, Mario
    Coda, Vittorio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 113 (02) : 265 - 283
  • [42] Corporate philanthropy and employee wellbeing: do types of corporate philanthropy matter?
    Chih-Hai Yang
    [J]. Eurasian Business Review, 2022, 12 : 803 - 828
  • [43] Developing a conceptual framework to identify corporate innovations through engagement with non-profit stakeholders
    Holmes, Sara
    Moir, Lance
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2007, 7 (04): : 414 - +
  • [44] Celebrity Philanthropy in China: An Analysis of Social Network Effect on Philanthropic Engagement
    Yang, Yongjiao
    Zhou, Wen
    Zhang, Dong
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2019, 30 (04): : 693 - 708
  • [45] Infrastructure Delivered Through Networks: Engagement of Stakeholders
    Beach, Sandra
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING ASSET MANAGEMENT (WCEAM 2012), 2015, : 61 - 69
  • [46] The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process
    Pomeroy, Robert
    Douvere, Fanny
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (05) : 816 - 822
  • [47] Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China
    Qi Guoyou
    Zeng Saixing
    Tam Chiming
    Yin Haitao
    Zou Hailiang
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 20 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [48] Sustainable social responsibility through stakeholders engagement
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Mercedes
    Gaspar-Gonzalez, Ana I.
    Sanchez-Teba, Eva M.
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (06) : 2425 - 2436
  • [50] Examining the Effects of High-Tech Corporate Brand Performances on the Internal Stakeholders and the External Stakeholders
    Wang Yi
    Wang Xingyuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS A-C, 2008, : 1819 - 1822