Phase transition and finite-size scaling for the integer partitioning problem

被引:40
|
作者
Borgs, C
Chayes, J
Pittel, B
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Math, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Misrosoft Res, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/rsa.10004
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of partitioning n randomly chosen integers between I and 2(m) into two subsets such that the discrepancy, the absolute value of the difference of their sums, is minimized. A partition is called perfect if the optimum discrepancy is 0 when the sum of all n integers in the original set is even, or 1 when the sum is odd. Parameterizing the random problem in terms of kappa = m/n, we prove that the problem has a phase transition at kappa = 1, in the sense that for kappa < 1, there are many perfect partitions with probability tending to 1 as n --> infinity, whereas for kappa > 1, there are no per-feet partitions with probability tending to 1. Moreover, we show that this transition is first-order in the sense the derivative of the so-called entropy is discontinuous at kappa = 1. We also determine the finite-size scaling window about the transition point: kappa (n) = 1 - (2n)(-1) log(2)n + lambda (n)/n, by showing that the probability of a perfect partition tends to 1, 0, or some explicitly computable p(lambda) epsilon (0, 1), depending on whether lambda (n) tends to -infinity, infinity lambda epsilon (-infinity, infinity), respectively. For lambda (n) --> -infinity fast enough, we show that the number of perfect partitions is Gaussian in the limit. For lambda (n) --> -infinity, we prove that with high probability the optimum partition is unique, and that the optimum discrepancy is Theta (2(lambdan)). Within the window, i.e., if \ lambda (n)\ is bounded, we prove that the optimum discrepancy is bounded. Both for lambda (n) --> infinity and within the window, we find the limiting distribution of the (scaled) discrepancy. Finally, both for the integer partitioning problem and for the continuous partitioning problem, we find the joint distribution of the k smallest discrepancies above the scaling window. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 288
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Finite-size scaling of the photon-blockade breakdown dissipative quantum phase transition
    Vukics, A.
    Dombi, A.
    Fink, J. M.
    Domokos, P.
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2019, 3
  • [22] Finite-size scaling and latent heat at the gonihedric first-order phase transition
    Janke, Wolfhard
    Mueller, Marco
    Johnstone, Desmond A.
    [J]. XXVI IUPAP CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS (CCP2014), 2015, 640
  • [23] Phase transition in the three dimensional Heisenberg spin glass: Finite-size scaling analysis
    Fernandez, L. A.
    Martin-Mayor, V.
    Perez-Gaviro, S.
    Tarancon, A.
    Young, A. P.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2009, 80 (02)
  • [24] Kinetic Ising model in an oscillating field: Finite-size scaling at the dynamic phase transition
    Sides, SW
    Rikvold, PA
    Novotny, MA
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (04) : 834 - 837
  • [25] Finite-size scaling of entanglement entropy at the Anderson transition with interactions
    Zhao, An
    Chu, Rui-Lin
    Shen, Shun-Qing
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2013, 87 (20):
  • [26] ON THE QUANTUM FINITE-SIZE SCALING
    KORUTCHEVA, ER
    TONCHEV, NS
    [J]. PHYSICA A, 1993, 195 (1-2): : 215 - 222
  • [27] Finite-size scaling of 4He at the superfluid transition
    Gasparini, Francis M.
    Kimball, Mark O.
    Mooney, Kevin P.
    Diaz-Avila, Manuel
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2008, 80 (03) : 1009 - 1059
  • [28] Finite-size scaling approach to dynamic storage allocation problem
    Seyed-allaei, H
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2003, 327 (3-4) : 563 - 569
  • [29] Microcanonical finite-size scaling
    Kastner, M
    Promberger, M
    Hüller, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 99 (5-6) : 1251 - 1264
  • [30] Microcanonical Finite-Size Scaling
    Michael Kastner
    Michael Promberger
    Alfred Hüller
    [J]. Journal of Statistical Physics, 2000, 99 : 1251 - 1264