Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy is Associated with Decreased Baroreceptor Sensitivity Compared to the Conventional Technique

被引:24
|
作者
Demirel, S. [1 ]
Macek, L. [1 ]
Bruijnen, H. [2 ]
Hakimi, M. [1 ]
Boeckler, D. [1 ]
Attigah, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Vasc Surg, Augsburg City Hosp, Munich, Germany
关键词
Carotid endarterectomy; Eversion CEA; Conventional CEA; Baroreceptor sensitivity; Carotid sinus nerve; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY; BLOOD-PRESSURE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SINUS NERVE; POSTOPERATIVE HYPERTENSION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Impairment of baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) has been shown to be associated with blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postoperative BRS changes following eversion CEA (E-CEA) and conventional CEA (C-CEA). Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing E-CEA (n = 37) and C-CEA (n = 27) were prospectively studied. Non-invasive measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were perioperatively obtained over three 10-min periods. Baroreflex gain was calculated as the sequential cross-correlation between heart rate and beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure. Results: Compared with changes observed after C-CEA, E-CEA was associated with an increase in systolic pressure (SP) (P = 0.01), diastolic pressure (DP) (P = 0.008), MAP (P = 0.002) and heart rate (HR) (P = 0.03) on postoperative day 1 (POD-1). BRS decreased after E-CEA from 6.33 to 4.71 ms mmHg(-1) on POD-1 (P = 0.001) and to 5.26 ms mmHg(-1) on POD-3 (P = 0.0004). By contrast, BRS increased after CCEA from 4.59 to 6.13 ms mmHg(-1) on POD-1 (P = 0.002) and to 6.27 ms mmHg(-1) on POD-3 (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: E-CEA and C-CEA have different effects on BRS. This is associated with an altered haemodynamic behaviour after E-CEA and C-CEA, respectively. These findings are likely the result of carotid sinus nerve interruption during E-CEA and preservation with C-CEA. (C) 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Technical results from the eversion technique of carotid endarterectomy
    Jones, CE
    Jescovitch, AJ
    Kahn, A
    Walters, GK
    Johnson, CJ
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1996, 62 (05) : 361 - 365
  • [22] Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique - Its safety and durability
    Shah, DM
    Darling, RC
    Chang, BB
    Paty, PSK
    Kreienberg, PB
    Lloyd, WE
    Leather, RP
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) : 471 - 476
  • [23] EVERSION ENDARTERECTOMY OF THE CAROTID-ARTERY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THROMBOENDARTERECTOMY
    KASPRZAK, PM
    RAITHEL, D
    VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 1993, : 86 - 87
  • [24] Hemodynamic Changes in Chevalier Eversion Versus Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy
    Taurino, M.
    Filippi, F.
    Persiani, F.
    Tirotti, C.
    Dito, R.
    Brancadoro, D.
    Rizzo, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 48 (05) : 514 - 520
  • [25] Partial Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy versus Conventional Techniques for Significant Carotid Stenosis
    Mazzaccaro, Daniela
    Righini, Paolo
    Giannetta, Matteo
    Modafferi, Alfredo
    Malacrida, Giovanni
    Nano, Giovanni
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 93 : 252 - 260
  • [26] Does the eversion technique have a lower early postoperative stroke rate than the conventional technique in carotid endarterectomy?
    Rahim, Ahmed Abdel
    Elsamani, Kareemaldin
    Galal, Ali Mahmoud
    Hammoda, Mohamed Ibrahim
    Mittapalli, Devender
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 81
  • [27] Arterial Eversion Is a Safe Technique for Redo and Primary Carotid Endarterectomy
    Arhuidese, Isibor J.
    Edwards, Jeffrey
    Fontenot, Danielle T.
    Parrack, Inkyong K.
    Nelson, Peter R.
    Johnson, Brad
    Malas, Mahmoud
    Shames, Murray L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : S213 - S214
  • [28] Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique - Its safety and durability - Discussion
    Debakey, ME
    Shah, DM
    Towne, JB
    Spencer, FC
    Imparato, AM
    Connolly, JE
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) : 476 - 478
  • [29] Carotid Endarterectomy with Modified Eversion Technique: Results of a Single Center
    Veraldi, Gian Franco
    Scorsone, Lorenzo
    Mastrorilli, Davide
    Bruno, Salvatore
    Macri, Marco
    Criscenti, Paolo
    Onorati, Francesco
    Faggian, Giuseppe
    Bovo, Chiara
    Mezzetto, Luca
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 72 : 627 - 636
  • [30] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVENTIONAL AND EVERSION CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Markovic, Dragan M.
    Davidovic, Lazar B.
    Maksimovic, Zivan L.
    Kuzmanovic, Ilija B.
    Ilic, Nikola S.
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2008, 136 (11-12) : 590 - 597