Characterization and normalization factors of abiotic resource depletion for life cycle impact assessment in China

被引:25
|
作者
Gao Feng [1 ]
Nie ZuoRen [1 ]
Wang ZhiHong [1 ]
Gong XianZheng [1 ]
Zuo TieYong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
resource depletion; abiotic resource categories; life cycle impact assessment (LCIA); magnesium production; the Pidgeon process; China;
D O I
10.1007/s11431-009-0028-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The availability of resources for economic activities differs between regions, and the importance of the resources is consequently observed to be different within regions compared to a global scale. With the current situation in Chinese mining industry and its statistic characteristics, the characterization procedures of abiotic resource in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) have demonstrated certain limitations in the Chinese materials industry. The aim of this paper is to propose new characterization and normalization factors for abiotic resource depletion categories such as metals and non-renewable energy resources in a Chinese context. The actual production of abiotic resources calculated by a modified model is compared to the reserve base in line with the new national standard to determine characterization factors in equivalence units, with antimony as the reference mineral. The normalization factors are based on the total base reserves of the most important minerals in China. A case study on primary magnesium production using the Pidgeon process is used to compare LCIA results for abiotic resource categories that are between current LCIA factors and the new Chinese factors. These factors not only reflect the importance of abiotic resource with respect to region-specific resource depletion, but also can compare with the global factors.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An endpoint model for life cycle impact assessment in China and preliminary normalization values: A case study of vehicles
    Li, Xueying
    Qian, Yi
    Xie, Minghui
    Liu, Dandan
    Qiao, Qi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [23] Development of Chinese characterization factors for land use in life cycle impact assessment
    Yu Liu
    ZuoRen Nie
    BoXue Sun
    ZhiHong Wang
    XianZheng Gong
    Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53 : 1483 - 1488
  • [24] Development of Chinese characterization factors for land use in life cycle impact assessment
    LIU YuNIE ZuoRenSUN BoXueWANG ZhiHong GONG XianZheng School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijing China
    Science China(Technological Sciences), 2010, 53 (06) : 1483 - 1488
  • [25] Novel Endpoint Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Terrestrial Acidification
    Lebrun, Marion N.
    Dorber, Martin
    Verones, Francesca
    Henderson, Andrew D.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 171
  • [26] Development of Chinese characterization factors for land use in life cycle impact assessment
    Liu Yu
    Nie ZuoRen
    Sun BoXue
    Wang ZhiHong
    Gong XianZheng
    SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 53 (06) : 1483 - 1488
  • [27] Chinese life cycle impact assessment factors
    YANG Jian\|xin 1*
    2. Department of Manufacturing Engineering
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2001, (02) : 205 - 209
  • [28] Sea use impact category in life cycle assessment: characterization factors for life support functions
    Langlois, Juliette
    Freon, Pierre
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Delgenes, Jean-Philippe
    Helias, Arnaud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (07): : 970 - 981
  • [29] Sea use impact category in life cycle assessment: characterization factors for life support functions
    Juliette Langlois
    Pierre Fréon
    Jean-Philippe Steyer
    Jean-Philippe Delgenès
    Arnaud Hélias
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 970 - 981
  • [30] Resource depletion assessment of renewable electricity generation technologies—comparison of life cycle impact assessment methods with focus on mineral resources
    Jana Lieberei
    Shabbir H. Gheewala
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 185 - 198