Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Partial Phase Postselection

被引:5
|
作者
Zhou, Yao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yin, Zhen-Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Rui-Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Shuang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Guang-Can [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Han, Zheng-Fu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, CAS Key Lab Quantum Informat, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, CAS Ctr Excellence Quantum Informat & Quantum Phys, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Hefei Natl Lab, Hefei 230088, Peoples R China
[4] State Key Lab Cryptol, POB 5159, Beijing 100878, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SECURITY;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.054026
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Quantum key distribution (QKD) allows two remote parties to share information-theoretically secure keys. In recent years, a revolutionary breakthrough called twin-field (TF) QKD has been developed to overcome the linear key-rate constraint and greatly increases the achievable distance. Phase randomization and subsequent postselection play roles in its security proof. Later, no-phase-postselection TF QKD was proposed and became a popular variant, since the removal of phase postselection leads to a higher key rate. However, the achievable distance is decreased compared to the original one. Here, we propose a TF QKD protocol with partial phase postselection. Namely, its code mode is still free from global phase randomization and postselection to make sure the advantage of the high key rate remain. On the other hand, phase postselection is introduced in the decoy mode to improve the performance. Applying an operator dominance condition, we prove universal security of the proposed protocol in the finite-key case under coherent attacks, and numerical simulations confirm its potential advantages in terms of key rate and achievable distance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Coherent-State-Based Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution
    Yin, Hua-Lei
    Chen, Zeng-Bing
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [32] Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution through Sending or Not Sending
    Liu, Yang
    Yu, Zong-Wen
    Zhang, Weijun
    Guan, Jian-Yu
    Chen, Jiu-Peng
    Zhang, Chi
    Hu, Xiao-Long
    Li, Hao
    Jiang, Cong
    Lin, Jin
    Chen, Teng-Yun
    You, Lixing
    Wang, Zhen
    Wang, Xiang-Bin
    Zhang, Qiang
    Pan, Jian-Wei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 123 (10)
  • [33] Twin-field quantum key distribution with three mutually unbiased bases
    Zhou, Yao
    Yin, Zhen-Qiang
    Wang, Shuang
    Chen, Wei
    Guo, Guang-Can
    Han, Zheng-Fu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2023, 107 (03)
  • [34] Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice
    Zong-Wen Yu
    Xiao-Long Hu
    Cong Jiang
    Hai Xu
    Xiang-Bin Wang
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [35] Measurement-Device-Independent Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution
    Yin, Hua-Lei
    Fu, Yao
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [36] Highly efficient twin-field quantum key distribution with neural networks
    Liu, Jingyang
    Jiang, Qingqing
    Ding, Huajian
    Ma, Xiao
    Sun, Mingshuo
    Xu, Jiaxin
    Zhang, Chun-Hui
    Xie, Shipeng
    Li, Jian
    Zeng, Guigen
    Zhou, Xingyu
    Wang, Qin
    SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (08)
  • [37] Measurement-Device-Independent Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution
    Hua-Lei Yin
    Yao Fu
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [38] Improved statistical fluctuation analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution
    Jooyoun Park
    Jonghyun Lee
    Jun Heo
    Quantum Information Processing, 2021, 20
  • [39] Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination
    Lai Zhou
    Jinping Lin
    Yumang Jing
    Zhiliang Yuan
    Nature Communications, 14 (1)
  • [40] Twin-field quantum key distribution with heralded single photon source
    Zhou, Fen
    Qu, Wenxiu
    Wang, Jipeng
    Dou, Tianqi
    Li, Zhenhua
    Yang, Shunyu
    Sun, Zhongqi
    Miao, Guoxing
    Ma, Haiqiang
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2020, 74 (09):