机构:
Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R ChinaInst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
Yang, Yongmin
[1
,2
]
Su, Hongbo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Texas A&M Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Kingsville, TX 78363 USAInst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
Su, Hongbo
[3
]
Zhang, Renhua
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R ChinaInst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
Zhang, Renhua
[1
]
Xia, Jun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R ChinaInst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
Xia, Jun
[1
]
机构:
[1] Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
Evaporation;
Complementary relationship;
Advection;
PRIESTLEY-TAYLOR PARAMETER;
COMPLEMENTARY RELATIONSHIP;
PAN EVAPORATION;
REGIONAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;
BARE SOIL;
WATER;
CHINA;
MOISTURE;
SMACEX;
TRENDS;
D O I:
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000659
中图分类号:
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号:
0813 ;
摘要:
In this paper, a revised advection-aridity evaporation model is presented to estimate actual evaporation over short time periods. The revised model is applied and validated against an existing data set. The time series comparisons in a soybean site and a corn site reveal that this revised model shows good performance in characterizing the diurnal variation in evapotranspiration. The coefficient of determination for these two sites is 0.92 and 0.87, respectively. To demonstrate the improvement of this model, comparisons between the authors' newly developed model and the other two revised models are carried out. The quantitative measures show that this revised model represents an obvious improvement compared with the other two models. For all of the sites, the mean absolute difference is less than 65 W/m(2), the root-mean-square difference is less than 85 W/m(2), and the coefficient of determination is greater than 0.7. Overall, results from this analysis indicate significant improvements for actual evapotranspiration estimation with this newly developed method. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000659. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.