Clinically relevant finite element technique based protocol to evaluate growing rods for early onset scoliosis correction

被引:10
|
作者
Shekouhi, Niloufar [1 ]
Dick, David [1 ]
Baechle, Maxwell William [1 ]
Kaeley, Dilpreet Kaur [1 ]
Goel, Vijay K. [1 ]
Serhan, Hassan [2 ,3 ]
Rawlinson, Jeremy [4 ]
Shaw, Derek [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Engn Ctr Orthoped Res Excellence E CORE, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Bioengn, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Univ Toledo, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[4] Medtronic Spine, Res & Technol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] DePuy Synthes Spine, Raynham, MA USA
来源
JOR SPINE | 2020年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
ASTM-F1717; Distraction; Finite Element Analysis; Scoliosis; Traditional Growing Rods (TGRs); SPINAL STABILIZATION DEVICES; ISO; 12189; STANDARD; PRECLINICAL EVALUATION; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; FIXATION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/jsp2.1119
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The emergence of distraction-based growing rods has provided the means to reduce the progression of spinal deformity in early onset scoliosis (EOS). The current protocols for evaluating spinal implants (ie, ASTM-F1717 and ISO-12189) were developed for fusion/dynamic devices. These protocols do not feature long unsupported rod lengths subjected to distraction. Due to the unsuitability of the existing guidelines for the evaluation of growing rods, a new distraction-based finite element protocol is presented herein for the first time. Method A vertebrectomy (VO) model from current protocols was modified to accommodate multi-spinal segments (ie, MS model) in which springs with appropriate stiffness were simulated in between the plastic blocks. To assess the efficacy of the protocol, two different computational studies were conducted: (a) compression-bending (MS-CB) with no distraction, and (b) distraction followed by compression-bending (MS-D + CB). In each study, the model with no axial connector (rods-only) was modified to include a) 80-mm long tandem (LT) connectors, and b) side-by-side (SBS) connectors. Stiffness and yield loads were calculated as per ASTM-F1717 guidelines and compared with the corresponding VO models with no distraction. In the MS-D + CB models, distraction was applied at the top block, stretching the spring-block construct in a simulation of scoliosis surgery prior to locking the construct at the connector-rods' interface. Results MS-CB models predicted higher stiffness and yield loads, compared to the VO models. The locking mechanism produced pre-existing stresses on the rod-connector interface, which caused a shift in the location of high-stress regions to the distraction site. Distraction led to a decrease in the construct's stiffness and yield load. Discussion The proposed protocol enables the simulation of clinical parameters that are not feasible in the F1717 models and predicted stress patterns in the hardware consistent with observed clinical failures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetically controlled growing rods in the management of early onset scoliosis: a systematic review
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Chiu, Wai On
    Scrofani, Raffaele
    Chiu, Wai Kwong
    Baroncini, Alice
    Iaconetta, Giorgio
    Maffulli, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [22] Early Onset Scoliosis: Is there an Improvement in Quality of Life With Conversion From Traditional Growing Rods to Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods?
    Bauer, Jennifer M.
    Yorgova, Petya
    Neiss, Geraldine
    Rogers, Kenneth
    Sturm, Peter F.
    Sponseller, Paul D.
    Luhmann, Scott
    Pawelek, Jeff B.
    Shah, Suken A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 39 (04) : E284 - E288
  • [23] Direct costs associated with the management of progressive early onset scoliosis: Estimations based on gold standard technique or with magnetically controlled growing rods
    Charroin, C.
    Abelin-Genevois, K.
    Cunin, V.
    Berthiller, J.
    Constant, H.
    Kohler, R.
    Aulagner, G.
    Serrier, H.
    Armoiry, X.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (05) : 469 - 474
  • [24] Finite Element Comparison of the Spring Distraction System and the Traditional Growing Rod for the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis
    Lemans, Justin V. C.
    Kodigudla, Manoj K.
    Kelkar, Amey, V
    Jayaswal, Daksh
    Castelein, Rene M.
    Kruyt, Moyo C.
    Goel, Vijay K.
    Agarwal, Aakash
    [J]. SPINE, 2022, 47 (10) : E456 - E465
  • [25] Early experience of surgical treatment with magnetically controlled growing rods in patients with early onset scoliosis
    Studer, Daniel
    Hasler, Carol-Claudius
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 2S - 2S
  • [26] Magnetic Controlled Growing Rods as a Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis Early Results With Two Patients
    Heydar, Ahmed Majid
    Sirazi, Serdar
    Bezer, Murat
    [J]. SPINE, 2016, 41 (22) : E1336 - E1342
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Surgical Technique Video
    Grabala, Pawel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [28] Minimizing Spine Autofusion With the Use of Semiconstrained Growing Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis in Children
    Bouthors, Charles
    Izatt, Maree T.
    Adam, Clayton J.
    Pearcy, Mark J.
    Labrom, Robert D.
    Askin, Geoffrey N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 38 (10) : E562 - E571
  • [29] Traditional versus magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis surgical treatment
    Farid Samadov
    Hacı Mustafa Ozdemir
    Mehmet Ali Talmac
    Samet Erinc
    Suleyman Cakirturk
    Bertan Cengiz
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 889 - 898
  • [30] Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with growing rods in patients with neurofibromatosis-1
    Carbone, Marco
    Vittoria, Francesca
    Del Sal, Alice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2019, 28 (03): : 278 - 287